Playing Catch

I like the possibility of a dedicated Daily thread. It would be at the expense of the other threads, perhaps, but so often the IGT and Daily-posters don't see eye-to-eye, so it could be a way to keep the peace. Good fences, good neighbors and all that.

What were Vegas lines in the spring? I've been told there is no one better at knowing (commanding?) the future than betting markets.

This board still predicted higher win totals than most of the experts in the industry. Obviously great baseball minds, here.

The best part about winning a world series would be ending the stupid, "you have to hit dingers to win in the playoffs" trope. You used to have to hit dingers in the regular season to win, too.

After Boyd's performance against the Brewers last week, I'd like to see Hamilton start and bunt down the first base line in his plate appearances to make Boyd play defense.

I think many teams have begun to exploit the Brewers style of hitting, which in this example means looking for "their" fastball, and adjusting to pull soft stuff in, or take, or foul-off stuff off the plate. I think opposing staffs have begun pitching backwards more often, or getting ahead with pitches that they know Brewers hitters will take (because they know that a fastball-out-of-the-hand in that part of the zone is an auto-take for Brewers early in the count, whether the pitch ends up being a back-door braking ball, or a fastball down in the zone).

David Ross made over $22M in his playing career. Many former players don't have to work for money. Therefore, he can wait for the "right opportunity". Also, while win-loss record will get a manager fired, it won't always get you hired. Perhaps (no idea) word got out that he just was merely "fine" as a manager, and no one feels compelled to go get him.

If we were looking for comps, I would compare Made to Jose Ramirez. They seem like very similar players, even though Ramirez learned his plate discipline as a switch-hitter at the big league level, basically immediately as a 20 year old. While Made may end up as a "poor-man's" Jose Ramirez, they have remarkably similar profiles.

Cubs fans have to ask themselves if they should even tune in. Peterson's K/BB% is not good. Against the Brewers? He'll be lucky to get through the 4th, and then the bullpen kicks in. I doubt the Cubs do anything different on the mound tonight since Peterson is 6'6" with elite extension and will be landing in the same vicinity as Miz. But I wouldn't put it past them to use a passing shower this afternoon to declare a rainout.

He should just throw a perfect game with an immaculate inning or two since he's breaking records. Anyone here that doesn't have a lot of background in baseball history (for whatever reason) should know that in this sports world filled with superlatives like Ohtani, that what Misiorowski is doing is seriously historic. I can't believe he's on my team.

It's the known unknowns that cloud any discussion on playing time... None of us know what the "other" player will do with any given plate appearance. The team has acknowledged recently (when starting a number of left-handed hitters against a lefty) that it's about the pitcher's repertoire, and how it relates to the swings of different players and I think that probably even considers defensive alignment of the opposition, and where they anticipate hitting the ball against a particular pitcher. So even though I was pleased as punch last night that Vaughn got to stay in the game against Palencia, for all we know, some lefty may have been able to park that slider into the seats. My point is, is that for all we know, Bauers has had a great season because they've been able to protect him from 15 more Ks, and 15 fewer walks by using Vaughn or Sanchez in different spots. The posters that demand hot hitters regardless of platoon are disregarding this known unknown. We may not like it, but teams across baseball are either leaning into platoon splits, or suffering the consequences of disregarding them --- or more likely, the consequences of having a weak bench of players with the same skillsets.

If the Brewers win the next three 1-0, 2-1, 5-4, no one in Chicago will remember the seven runs allowed by Andrew Vaughn, and their enthusiasm will transition to wondering if they've "peaked too early," or that they "rely too much on the HR," or that their bullpen stinks. We'll be back to crowing about owning the division. But even if ultimately, the Brewers succumb to the inevitable Cubs, it won't be because they suck, or because they forgot how to play good baseball. They have been a .600+ winning team for too long for them to collapse, I think [knocks wood]. Stay the course. Get to their 'pen. Play your way. Play clean. Play hard. Relaxed focus. Rinse, repeat. Bob's [Gasser] your uncle.

I tend to believe that his good fastball has more to do with movement and location than pure velo, but it's always nice to have 2-3 more clicks. His location last night was middle-middle. Even w/o tipping, the Cubs lineup will rock you. You simply have to hit your spots, and he couldn't do it. Credit the Cubs with keeping him in the zone, but it wasn't hard with him spraying pitches all over the place whenever he tried for a corner.

Worst game of the season. The failure of Frelick to challenge that ball-called-strike on the strike-em-out-throw-em-out DP, and the failed Bauers flip to Harrison were early back-breakers. They had a chance to make Holmes work in the heat early, and let him off the hook. Had they been able to get to the pen, perhaps they could have made things harder the rest of the week. There should be an acknowledgement that the game was a great set-up for the Cubs. Holmes' sinker was incredible at times last night in the thick air. A perfect foil for Wrigley's windy weather. But it doesn't change the fact the Brewers were collectively poor. It's obvious that Harrison's velocity and tipping were the primary culprits responsible for the massacre, but the Brewers TERRIBLE performance was team-wide. They weren't ready to play. Blame it on the heat/humidity/nerves/youth/Cubs/Wrigley/Murphy/whatever... Doesn't matter. That was an embarrasing performance, and I expect that they will be ready to play tonight. Putrid performance. I have hope that Murphy/Harrison are being truthful about his mechanics being out of whack, which could explain all of it (velo, movement, location, and tipping). But I still kind of feel like they should option him or IL-him or something so that he can rest up and get things straightened out. If he's injured and waiting to have surgery, that's fine, but then his role needs to be lessened so that you can control for a blow-up outing, which he's proving he's capable of having. It's games like last night that jeopardize his being able to be trusted to pitch in the playoffs unless it's part of a bullpen-game.

My guess is that he was indirectly telling his team to relax and not put the playoff chase cart in front of the horse. Nothing more to read into it, and as Snapper says above, the statement isn't exactly breaking news. No team should feel like they failed because they didn't win 100 games.

If you are trying to run through Shohei, Freeman, PCA, and Matt Olson, you could use all of the lefties you can get. But when you have Gasser, and in varying roles, Harrison, Drohan, and Ashby, it gives them tremendous flexibility, roster-wise in each series. And if any of those guys have issues with certain RH pitches, like Henderson's changeup, or Senzatela's sinker, they could really get matchup-happy in the playoffs.

Sounds like a self-affirmation he says into the mirror every night before bed.

I agree that the ad-free, buttery-smooth experience is well worth it for myself as a daily user. My fear is that Brock isn't making enough money on us, either. It wouldn't be like me to wear something like a Brewerfanatic or Twins Daily t-shirt around the Twin Cities, but I do think that kind of advertising would work on me. If I saw a few people wearing t-shirts around the fair, or if they were being given away near the KFAN booth, it may pique my interest more than seeing something on my Bluesky (or maybe it would encourage me to click on the next Bluesky??). But that may be grasping at straws, particularly because none of us need more free t-shirts or corporate swag. Offering some kind of discount for recruiting new members IRL? Tough to sort out bots/people perhaps, no idea.

If there is a sweep this series, it's gunna be a Brewers sweep. Book it. Facing Harrison, Gasser, and Miz looks like a Golden Sombrero for PCA tonight, tomorrow, and Wednesday (Couns will probabaly give him a mental break Thursday night). Maybe he scratches out an infield single at some point. Fly the L, Chicago. Good luck next season. Go find an Old Style to cry into and go root for the Gary Bears.

I don't envy the challenges you are facing. I don't have enough background to brainstorm solutions. But the current landscape for content creators must be really discouraging. This isn't a Diamond Centric problem. Using the "free" advertising of social media to pull folks to a place that features more advertising, though, is a money-chase that's reaching it's crescendo. Between the constant 2 and 3-step verifications, new passwords, app updates, credit card info... there's simply already too much "wasted time," or wasted frustration on phones for people to sift through embedded Xings that don't load w/o an account, or to deal with a browser update that's merely loading up fresh advertising. But I do think that sites that feature real community have a long-term advantage over other content creation. Fostering that good will may not make enough money in the short-term, but it could offer enough of a baseline to delay hard decisions long enough for there to be movement on the anti-Monopoly legislative front in future years.

In my opinion, I don't see a scenario where he doesn't fit on the roster. His skills defensively (speed, body control, hands, arm) are all apparent. He just needs reps. If his glove or arm ends up being too inconsistent to play in the infield, he can move to the OF and probably be just fine in a corner. I think his offense is too promising to expect any other outcome. Time will tell if he will progress to being a plus, or better player in the big leagues, but his prospect-potential is too great to let another team find out. There's usually only 1-5 prospects at any given time that have his kind of ceiling. Trade the other guys first if there is a logjam.

I think that, if Murph had it to do over again, he may do things differently, instead of yanking a rookie after a base hit. But as is suggested with some of the other comments here, I don't think these types of things are done in a vacuum. Murphy is with these guys all of the time. He sees a lot. The whole thing looked a little unfair to me, sure. But IF Murphy is good at this, and I happen to think he's really good at this, he knows who he could do this to and who he couldn't (or shouldn't, IMO. You don't bench and embarrass Contreras the same way. Dude puts it on the line day after day and is a two-time all-star). And as someone mentioned, this was clearly more of a mentality check than an effort check. If Cooper Pratt is going to be the best option at shortstop in the playoffs as a 22-year old, he's going to need to squeeze every last drop of his focus, aggressiveness, and competitiveness that he's got. Because I guarantee that Andrew Vaughn can't wait to play more third base, and he's a player that doesn't seem to lack for concentration and in-game focus. Would Pratt have gotten the bunt down? I don't know. Would he have made it to 2nd on the blooper? I don't know. But should he have tried?

We all knew at the time of the deal that there was a high liklihood that the last couple of years of the deal could be "painful". I think it's important, as a marketable enterprise, to have strong brand recognition. Yelich has served in that role with distinction. He's humble, hard-working, and by all accounts a pretty good human being. Like so many of the contributors to this organization, I like to appreciate him for all of the things that he is and has been, rather than disappointed about all of the things he is not and may never be.

If a GM wanted to add more pitching, the GM could get it w/o trading one of your top 7 or 8 most valuable players in the organization. Made should be kept. You don't trade guys like him.

I believe the Brewers are arguably the most well-run franchise in pro sports. That doesn't happen by accident.