Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

Playing Catch

Verified Member
  • Posts

    2,207
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    12

 Content Type 

Profiles

Forums

Blogs

Events

News

2026 Milwaukee Brewers Top Prospects Ranking

Milwaukee Brewers Videos

2022 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

Milwaukee Brewers Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

2024 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

The Milwaukee Brewers Players Project

2025 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Playing Catch

  1. In short, yes. There were a lot of thoughts that I had during the whole ordeal. My head was telling me that the most likely scenario was that managers, on the whole, don't make much of a difference in terms of in-game decision-making, and winning or losing on any given day, but that the good ones help lead a team through the grind of the season with the way that they respond to players behind the scenes, and how well they jive with the front office. I figured that Counsell was a good manager because he worked well with the players, kept a good clubhouse culture, and was of like mind with the front office and scouting. But I also felt that Counsell hired Murphy in his first season for a reason, and that Murphy probably had/has many of the same qualities. However, as it played out, I was worried that I was wrong about all of that. I mean, Jed Hoyer paid A LOT for Counsell. Hoyer knows the business FAR BETTER than I do. But as it's playing out, I'm feeling like my head was right all along. I had many of the same thoughts with losing Stearns. I felt like the entire Brewers operation has a lot of deliberate redundancy in leadership (and on the field), in order to not suffer big drop-offs when people leave. For all we know, the former Rays executive, Matt Arnold was fundamental in Stearns' success. For all we know, Murphy was fundamental to Counsell's success.
  2. On MLB NOW yesterday, Brian Kenny was highlighting the fact that the shortstop position is really, really deep in MLB right now. Perhaps the deepest it has ever been. EXCEPT for the Dodgers, what other team would be bidding on him? Maybe Seattle? I just don't think, even if the Brewers were inclined, that they would find a team that would be willing to part with even fair value, let alone the value we would want to see from trading a good starting shortstop.
  3. I'd be surprised if he didn't add about 5 mph in the next 5 years. By then he'll be... 23.
  4. Who? Chourio? I kid. But if Chourio starts looking like a good big-leaguer, perhaps trading for Robert makes less sense. Now don't get me wrong, Robert would still be a better player than the internal options, but at that price-point, maybe you just stick with the kids.
  5. I was slow to get to this point in thinking, mostly due to how great Turang is as a defender --- I had a hard time accepting that Ortiz could be as good defensively. But after seeing him get a few innings there, it looks like the Brewers have a really strong keystone-connection for the foreseeable future. The other thing is that for the Brewers, having a great defensive 2nd-baseman (hang with me here), may just be MORE important these days than having a great shortstop. The shift rules, obviously, made defense at 2nd super-important. And usually, your 3rd baseman is a stronger defender than your first baseman. I still think Turang is the rangier, stronger-armed defender. He converts so many outs (like last night's last out), by ranging far to his right, and still being able to make accurate throws from that spot. If your team features a decent 3rd baseman, he should be cutting off a lot of those tough throws from the hole for the SS. Sorry to derail the thread.
  6. I'm NOT advocating for this, but part of me is really, really interested in not trading for a starter at all. I just want to see how much further they can push this.
  7. I'm really intrigued by Patrick. To my untrained eye, he's got goofy fangraph stats, that I can't make much sense of. His BABIPs are all over the place, he's always stranding runners, It looks like he must live up in the zone with a good fastball, and gives up lots of flyballs, which, go out of the park a lot. Good K-rates. BB-rates are inconsistent, but have been decent this year. Like, maybe a 3TO pitcher?
  8. Chourio getting hot! His ROY campaign starts NOW! Let's gooooo!!!
  9. So is this "brace procedure," that a couple of guys have had, basically making a tendon that is totally normal and acceptable for most human beings a "super-tendon"? Making it bigger and stronger so that it can throw baseballs really hard?
  10. I was never really on Turang's bandwagon until just before his debut, and I read something that quoted one of the fangraphs scouts (Longenhagen, probably). He was asked what prospects he felt were "underrated," or maybe, "overlooked," by the rest of the scouting community, and he mentioned how much he liked Turang. It was then that I wondered if he was showing more on a day-by-day basis than what the underlying stats were revealing. Certainly, he's a stud on a day-by-day basis. He can go 0-4, with a BB, SB, 1-run scored. Doesn't look like much unless you are watching the game, and notice how his speed and instincts on the basepaths all but scored the run on their own. You watch the game, and his 2 or 3 gold-glove plays on defense saved runs in the later innings. He's such a good ballplayer.
  11. I miss the days when I could get excited about recruits and dream on what they could become. I know we're all feeling the same thing, but you just don't know what the 2024/25 roster will look like until November, let alone what subsequent rosters will look like.
  12. I think that I know baseball pretty well. Then I come to this thread and feel so stupid. My memory stinks. You all are amazing. I'll cheat sometimes when I know the player but can't think of his name. Or often with the team-team parts, I'll look up old rosters to remind myself who played on those teams.
  13. Is Hoskins hobbled at all? I think it's curious that he's not at first with Contreras DHing. I'm all for Contreras sitting out a couple of games, but I'd prefer it wasn't against the best left-hander in baseball.
  14. I keep coming to this same sort of thinking with a lot of the positions, or possible trades. The lineup could look MUCH different in a month... Chourio could get hot, and get Mitchell back, maybe Black comes up. All of these things could really change the offensive outlook. And with the pitching, I mean... They keep churning out quality innings. With the days off during a playoff series, a team can really rely on their bullpen. Do we really want them to give up these good prospects for "average" big league production?
  15. I wanted to start a "Blake Perkins Appreciation Thread," but (A), I wasn't sure that was a big enough topic on its own to merit a thread, and (B), I was worried it would jinx him. I was going to find some thread to highlight his contributions, but realized there are so many pleasant surprises on this team so far. I saw someone in the IGT thought he was closing in on "favorite player," territory. Are there any other favorite storylines so far? Perkins, BTW, has already racked up 1.5 fWAR on the season. He just makes so many winning baseball plays, as do many of the other guys. Up and down the lineup, Ortiz, Yelich, Contreras, the Turangutan. They've all been great. And I haven't even mentioned the pitching.
  16. Really, the division is shaping up as most of the pre-season projections projected, other than the Brewers, being on a 96-win pace before any trades, and with a patchwork rotation. What is the Brewers secret??
  17. How awesome is it that it's June and we're debating the competency of the Brewers offense, and comparing it to the "other" top offenses in MLB?
  18. We've all been there... well, all of us except for torts.
  19. This is a great point. Coming into the season, that's exactly what I was thinking. Play all the kids and see what you've got. At the same time, that mentality is perhaps taking playoff-caliber teams for granted. There's no guarantee that the rest of the division won't improve significantly in coming seasons, and all the Brewers are left with is the apple's core.
  20. I think that so much of my concern about not just Robert, but Crochet and Fedde, too, is the Sox-stink that comes with the idea of getting them. I think if they played for just about any other team, I'd think they were better players. Especially with the injury-risk. It's why I always hated the idea of getting Eloy Jimenez. If I hold my nose and consider Robert again, I can't help but think that the Brewers ABSOLUTELY should try to get him. Although, his salary is not nothing for the Brewers' front office to deal with.
  21. This is where I'm at. Next year's rotation has just as many question marks.
  22. Did Fedde reinvent himself in Korea? If so, perhaps I've been discounting his ability. He's not "cheap," making $7.5M this year and next. Perhaps that impacts what the Sox could get for him? Crochet makes me really nervous. I feel better about the Marlins guys.
  23. I totally understand the recency bias, here, but is Fedde such an upgrade over Myers (considering team control), that we'd just give him up for Fedde? Seems like robbing Peter to pay Paul considering Myers is a rotation contributor.
×
×
  • Create New...