In short, yes.
There were a lot of thoughts that I had during the whole ordeal. My head was telling me that the most likely scenario was that managers, on the whole, don't make much of a difference in terms of in-game decision-making, and winning or losing on any given day, but that the good ones help lead a team through the grind of the season with the way that they respond to players behind the scenes, and how well they jive with the front office.
I figured that Counsell was a good manager because he worked well with the players, kept a good clubhouse culture, and was of like mind with the front office and scouting. But I also felt that Counsell hired Murphy in his first season for a reason, and that Murphy probably had/has many of the same qualities.
However, as it played out, I was worried that I was wrong about all of that. I mean, Jed Hoyer paid A LOT for Counsell. Hoyer knows the business FAR BETTER than I do. But as it's playing out, I'm feeling like my head was right all along.
I had many of the same thoughts with losing Stearns. I felt like the entire Brewers operation has a lot of deliberate redundancy in leadership (and on the field), in order to not suffer big drop-offs when people leave. For all we know, the former Rays executive, Matt Arnold was fundamental in Stearns' success. For all we know, Murphy was fundamental to Counsell's success.