I mentioned Guerrero in the thread about the Hector Olivera signing, but I figured he's worth his own thread. Yesterday, ESPN Los Angeles reported that the Brewers are one of the teams who have expressed interesting in trading for Guerrero, though they are reportedly wary of his remaining salary: http://espn.go.com/blog/los-angeles/dodger-report/post/_/id/13337/alex-guerrero-has-forged-a-role Even before the Olivera signing, Pundits were suggesting that Guerrero had no role with the Dodgers (further complicated by the fact that they cannot option him to the minors due to his contract), e.g.: http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/trying-to-solve-the-alex-guerrero-problem/ That doesn't necessarily make sense to me, since the Dodgers will have openings at 2B and 3B next season and they could play Guerrero at 2B and Olivera at 3B (presuming they think Guerrero is a better everyday player than Justin Turner). Frankly, I don't understand why Guerrero is considered a "failed" signing considering he put up an extremely impressive .977 OPS in AAA last season (as a middle infielder) - with 15 HR in only 65 games - and was never given a chance to play in the majors. I would love for the Brewers to trade for Guerrero, but the problem is that his contract allows him to opt out of his contract for 2016 and 2017 if he is traded. Clearly, we don't need a 2B/3B in 2015 badly enough to take on a substantial commitment (although we do starting in 2016). However, if they can renegotiate the contract or come to some agreement keeping Guerrero under team control for three more seasons, it's a great deal. He is a RHB who can platoon with Scooter at 2B this season (and backup any A-Ram injuries), and then be the everyday 3B for 2016 and 2017.