I am fascinated by statistics. I love going online and discovering the OPS, OXS, and VORP of my favorite players. But like many baseball fans I find statistics to be inherently incomplete. After all, statistics only show the effect of a players performance, and as we all know to every effect there is a cause. The stats of Adam Dunn are out of this world. Thus far in the season he has 34 HRs, a .395 OBP, a .594 SLG%, a .989 OPS, and a 3TO of 50.3%. But the biggest drawback that Dunn has is the rate in which he strikeout. He set the single season record in 2004 with 195 K's and has 124 K's in 2005. You can't help but wonder what his numbers would be like if he cut his strikeout rate in half. Or can you? Why is it that Dunn K's once every 3.18 ABs? From what I have seen and by all accounts I have heard Adam Dunn has an amazing eye at the plate. This is verified by his 84 walks on the season. No, the reason that Dunn strikes out so much is because he swings for the fences. Although this causes him to strikeout a lot, it also allows his SLG% to be through the roof. (That and his eye at the plate, obviously.) If Dunn were to try and cut his K rate by simply trying to put the bat on the ball he would not have nearly as high a SLG% because he would not have as many HRs or 2Bs. Adam Dunn perfectly illustrates how cause and effect in baseball, and that all that stats indicate is the effect.