I like Perkins a lot too. Honestly, I like all this forum's favorite scapegoats (other than maybe Rengifo, who hasn't really been around long enough for me to have a sense of him as a player or personality--I don't have a negative impression, just sort of a neutral one). More than that, I can understand why the Brewers want to give guys like Perk and Hamilton a chance. Both of them have valuable skillsets (I think Lockridge has a more valuable one, and I'm actually quite a big fan of Baddoo, who's shown some pop at Nashville in a limited sample since coming back, but I think individual mileage on all those guys may vary).
The issue is that it's just that we have about 2 or 3 of the same kind of infielder playing and about 2 or 3 of the same kind of outfielder. When you're dealing with replacement-level types, you start to wonder why, when one struggles, you don't just roll the dice with another.
I don't think the Brewers are wrong to keep Perk and Hamilton. Maybe they like their personalities or something (meant genuinely; I think Murph is big on that, and he might actually be good at evaluating it, given his track record). Maybe they just don't think it's worth messing with. I will say that they've given Hamilton a longer leash than I'd have expected. If Perk continues this level of production all the way up until Lockridge is activated in 3 or 4 weeks, that'll surprise me too.
All in all, just interesting to parse the thought process because clearly this team is really fun in a lot of ways.