Kremer basically had an awful first half of 2017 when, as a guy who it sounds like had less pitching experience than your normal college arm, he almost skipped low A and got tossed into one of the more offensively skewed leagues in the minors. He was an above average pitcher there for the second half of the season and one of the best in the league so far this year. Like Bannon, the Dodgers probably should have promoted him sooner, but even with the available data he seems much more intriguing than a lot of the Diaz and filler talk would suggest, and I think that if he were in the Brewers system we'd be mentioning him as a top-10 guy. Outside of Peralta before his promotion, the only pitcher in the Brewers system who is having a season comparable to his this year is Brown. I'm with you on Burnes + Woodruff or Brown being an overpay, and I'm not sure that the Orioles wouldn't have viewed that as the type of package they would have demanded from the Brewers. I guess my larger point is, while betting on pop-up prospects can be risky, it is perhaps even more foolish to completely discount the added value from breakout seasons, which seems to be the case in much of the analysis I've seen on this trade, primarily citing preseason prospect rankings in panning the return. (Note: I do NOT include the post I'm replying to on this list, just explaining why I'm leery of some of the opinions I was seeing immediately after the trade and why I'm skeptical that the Brewers could have gotten him for as little as some people on here seem to be assuming.)