You've been paying too much attention to the opinions on mlbtraderumors site who for no apparent reason are down on him. Garza's the exact same guy he's always been and that's a solid mid rotation starter. He's not a dominant guy, but he's posted 4 straight quality starts and he's under contract for next year too at what these days is fairly reasonable terms. Any big market team that fancies itself as a contender that finds itself in a bind for a starter will be interested. Value? Well Boston got Joe Kelly AND Allen Craig for John Lackey (who's older and more expensive than Garza) last year. Kelly's struggled recently but I'd take him. Nobody saw Craig falling off a cliff. The value on Garza is just a huge question mark. He is not all that young, comes with injury risk(though we have yet to see a major injury in his Brewers contract), and isn't all that cheap. By no means is he expensive, but near market value doesn't help his trade value. I surely wouldn't trade him for less than a Top 100 prospect as I think he is worth it, but then again it doesn't really matter what I think. Like you stated there is always a ton of desperation for mid rotation starters every year. There definitely should be some desperate teams on the prowl. As for the Red Sox trade I am pretty sure most agreed it was a bad deal for the Sox from the get go. They got Joe Kelly who is about to hit arbitration not to mention not that great anyway and an expensive Allen Craig who fell of the cliff last year. Quite sad they got that for a solid starter making $1mil this year.