Okay here me out, imagine if the word 'Article' wasn't included. What exactly is the difference? They are basically just threads with a better opener than a normal thread.
I think the issue could be changed to help the forum a bit. First off, I do see an issue that a lot of these articles are covering something already waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay gone over already. Why is an article being written and approved about the Contreras trade, Winker acquisition, or something related to the shift. Then one guy is grading the offseason and another is questioning if it was a failure or not. I mean, really? I also question the frequency of articles. Multiple articles a day with C grade quality? It feels very forced and not at all caring about quality. Is anything actually denied?
The articles and the concept aren't the problem. It is the topics being chosen and the approval of some shotty work. I view the articles much like just a regular thread starter....but really, the expectation should be better than that. I don't think people really want to hear some guys opinion on a topic that has already been beat to death for months. That person should just go make a simple response to an already existing post...not waste time writing an article. We all have already made our opinions known.