Is that last comment specific to the Brewers, or to the product MLB is putting on the field these days? http://www.espn.com/blog/buster-olney/insider/post/_/id/18486/olney-have-big-swings-big-flies-and-big-whiffs-broken-baseball Perhaps both, but I was specifically (and emotionally) talking about the Brewers with my research and criticism. If someone told you that you were obligated to spend 3 hours watching a game, that your team would score 2 runs without the aid of a homer, and they would fail to score at all in more than 75 percent of the innings, would you do it? And, would you do it at the stadium, with all the expense and (perhaps) inconvenience of getting there and back? I'm a 20-game seat holder, and I'm leaning heavily toward giving them up after this year. This is supposed to be a contending team, and even with their winning record, it is a dreadful watch. Who says it's supposed to be a contending team? The only thing I'm surprised about is the bullpen and that's the only reason they have a winning record (that and Counsell/Stearns plan to limit the rotation as much as possible and use as many bullpen innings as you can). This offense hasn't cracked the top 20 in runs scored since 2014, adding Cain and Yelich doesn't move the needle enough to change that. The rotation is bad, but with the organizational strategy to limit their innings, and a bullpen that's been out of this world good, they've won some games. I doubt at the end of the year though, you're going to have four 70+ inning relievers with ERAs below 2.