82brewcrew82
-
Posts
9,006 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
4
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Milwaukee Brewers News, Rumors & Analysis
2026 Milwaukee Brewers Top Prospect Rankings
Milwaukee Brewers Videos
2022 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses
Milwaukee Brewers Trade & Free Agent Rumors
Milwaukee Brewers Fan Guides & Resources
2023 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses
2024 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses
The Milwaukee Brewers Players Project
2025 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses
2026 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by 82brewcrew82
-
If that is the case, I'm good with starting Anderson on a short short leash... Me too.
-
I'm feeling a plumbing issue at the house that I need to see resolved.
-
All this angst about who starts. Does it really matter? We will throw out one of our starters that has a 50/50 chance of being good for four innings and hope for the best. The analytics will decide who that is.
-
Three chances to be in the NLDS. It would be disappointing to not win one of those.
-
Two chances to be in the NLDS. It would be disappointing to not win one of those.
-
Big time advantage for them.
-
Tigers the only non-contender playing ball today.
-
Cards have about rolled over. Let's make sure we take care of our business.
-
I'd be more worried against a better offense. This may actually work.
-
Why was Barnes the choice here? The guy crumbles when this situation is pressure packed.
-
That guy needs a gold glove too as long as we are handing out hardware tonight.
-
Probably should have cut Knebel too when he was struggling. Games like that are going to happen when your entire rotation is pitch to contact types. Relax and watch the next 8.5 innings. I forgot Davies was an all star and throws 98. He’s an mlb average soft tosser, don’t need him anymore. Funny how this team has won 92 game with out a single one of those in the rotation. Imagine if we did have one.
-
Probably should have cut Knebel too when he was struggling. Games like that are going to happen when your entire rotation is pitch to contact types. Relax and watch the next 8.5 innings.
-
Well, wouldn't be the 2018 Brewers without making it interesting.
-
I don't like the pitching matchups for the Cubs and their pen is shaky at best. If the Cards are fighting for a playoff spot the Cubs are going to get everything they can handle and then some. Then again I apparently only consider ERA so what do I know. Wouldn't be surprised if the Cubs drop two which would make me look silly for thinking the Brewers had zero shot at the division for quite some time now.
-
Two chances to advance as opposed to one. I would take the tiebreaker game on Monday 10 times out of 10. Particularly with the way the Brewers are constructed with regard to starting pitching. It think that scenario plays into their hands better than it would most other teams. I don't see how having to play back-to-back would be a huge issue for this team and, as you noted, two chances to move on is far better than one.
-
Since lester basically makes more per year than the entire brewer rotation combined, that's a low hurdle to clear. Fact is Lester got lucky a few early inning abs with runners on everywhere didn't send him to the showers much earlier when he was battling control. 0 runs is nice no matter how you get there, but that was far from a solid start just by looking at him pitch. I think his back issue from early September is still lingering... You are absolutely correct. Unfortunately style points are not part of the game. As you stated, keeping runs off the board is the objective of the game regardless of how you get there. The bold part could describe the majority of starts from our rotation. If Lester is garbage then what do we have?
-
The result which was 0 ER which is ERA. Say it all you want but all you focused on was the ERA, not how he actually pitched. I mean sure if you want to be super shallow the results were great, doesn't mean his pitching was great. OK, you win.
-
The result which was 0 ER which is ERA. Say it all you want but all you focused on was the ERA, not how he actually pitched. I mean sure if you want to be super shallow the results were great, doesn't mean his pitching was great.
-
No, not really. I focused on the result and the Point still stands, the board would be ecstatic with six shootout innings form any of our starters.
-
You would be, I would not. Seriously ERA is about the 20th stat I go to for how someone pitched. I'd be happy with the result but I would understand the result has nothing to do with how the guy actually pitched. ERA over a 7 IP sample is completely worthless. I didn't say anything about ERA. I guarantee this board would ecstatic with any one of our starters throwing six shutout innings. No question.
-
If one of our starters threw that exact same line we'd be jumping for joy.
-
Really?