I'll take you at your word on that first paragraph because everything in there is false. I'd also check the tenor of your posts before calling someone else crabby. The only premise I've had is that we don't have enough pitching and performance to date, factually, bears that out. You, on the other hand, are cherry picking out stats you don't like, assuming health and performance trends will continue unchecked and are ignoring the fact that those very pitchers are still very much in the teams plans (not to mention on the active roster). But it's me that is dealing in hypotheticals and opinions? The bolded part above is ENTIRELY hypothetical. You have no idea if it will work out that way or not. You don't how Nelson is going to perform. You are assuming that Chacin is going to overcome this series of wretched starts. It's all opinion. Yet you have the nerve to tell me I'm all about hypotheticals and opinions. No sir, that is your game. Lastly, I literally said you did a great job but I guess anything other than total agreement with your OPINON is.........classy stuff? You are just crabby because you called the kids aces and they proved they weren't ready to be starters. Untrue, wrong guy, I apologize. Peralta doesn't have a starters pitch profile. Find me the long list of starters who are anywhere near 78.5% FB, 19.4$ CU, 2.1% CH. You'll find very few do. True. His stuff plays better out of the pen. You'll find most relievers have a similar pitch profile. True. Burnes is a totally different story. He throws 5 pitches. 55.1% FB, 27.5% SL, 4.2 SI, 4.5 CH, 8.5 CB. That's a starters profile. That's true. It is not surprising at all that Peralta has been better out of the pen. Because he has a relief pitchers pitch profile. True. He throws the FB nearly 80% of the time. 78.5% qualifies as NEARLY. True. You can't call what I'm saying false just because you want it to be. Those things are facts. 4 guys have tanked this ERA. True. There are a number of guys who could do better and a number who could do worse. Do you actually think we are seeing the best every pitcher on this staff can do? The team does this seemingly every year where they work through a couple starters and pen arms until they've shuttled the staff to the right mix. You've watched this team and seen the evidence of this. True. You, on the other hand, are cherry picking out stats you don't like, assuming health and performance trends will continue unchecked and are ignoring the fact that those very pitchers are still very much in the teams plans (not to mention on the active roster). Not cherry picking at all. I've left random bad options in the numbers I've posted. Those things happen. I didn't pull out Williams, Claudio, Wilkerson. Jackson or even Chacin, I'd be cherry picking if I was. Burnes as a starter and Peralta as a starter was a mistake and they clearly get that. Barnes is up as of today. He's also up because 2 starters are on the IL and Jimmy isn't back yet. Williams is in the numbers. I'm also not assuming health, but I'm not assuming a health implosion. Both are unlikely. I'm not pointing towards anything traded in, that's hypothetical as it could effect the team for the better or worse. I'm simply showing that there are 4 warts on this staff. 2 young kids starting early when they weren't ready to start. 2 gas cans in the pen who sucked as badly as Boone and Drake did early last year. I could put Barnes back in if you'd like. It wouldn't change a lot. This wasn't with an axe to grind. This was posted because our ERA looks worse than it is because 2 rushed kids and 2 bums who we don't need to pitch really did a number on the ERA. If we don't use them, the arms are in place for the numbers to hit the 3.9-4.0 ERA goal. This doesn't fit your narrative of us needing MORE so you don't like it. The truth is this pitching staff is plenty good enough if they stop trotting out a few pieces who are shooting them in the foot. They have options to work through who can put an end to that. Truly the only one that hasn't been dealt with is Burnes on the MLB roster. Today we have Barnes and Williams up. Barnes is not in the stats, Williams is in the stats. Nelson's next up and 1 of them goes down. He might suck, he might be good. I don't know, I don't care. If he is a 4ERA guy he doesn't shoot us in the foot. He stays then. Gio and Chacin are also out sending another 1 down each. That's 3, Barnes Burnes Williams. If we get all 3 back the team has 6 starters so pick one for the pen. Does Nelson go to the pen, does Chacin? I don't know. Doesn't matter and I don't need to project it. Alex Wilson isn't coming back unless all heck breaks loose. Unless we hit a massive rash of starter injuries Peralta and Burnes should not start again this year. If the team suffers a health implosion (which is a hypothetical) then the team needs more pitching. As of now, the team doesn't. They just need to stop pushing Burnes and Peralta into a starting role and give up on Wilson. They've done that. Burnes and Barnes as well... not yet. Doesn't fit your narrative. But its also the truth of the season we've seen and expecting a change dramatically for the better or worse is hypothetical speculation. GET IT? The season has shown Peralta starting bad, Peralta pen good. Anderson into the starting rotation coupled with Peralta to the pen has resolved the issue. Burnes starting bad, Gio added removes that. Houser to the pen has remedied Wilson Barnes in the pen has been bad. He is up due to 2 injuries. Why him, no idea, other options have produced better. Burnes in the pen is still bad. We haven't solved that yet but there are options left to try. Not only Nelson who is unknown, but Hart, Burch, Petricka who are in the numbers. When you fix those issues, and the only ones not fixed are a long leash on Burnes and Barnes fip appreciation. The ERA is EXACTLY where we want it. Anything beyond that is hypothetical. What I'm stating is TODAY, and KNOWN. You can want to say we need more because you want this team to be better than a 3.9-4.0 ERA club but the team needs to be a 3.9-4.0 club and it has the horses to do so. This is factual. This is the truth. This is the exact way Stearns does this. GET IT?