I guess I am kind of on board with this, but I'm down more on Urias long term impact. I don't really care if Urias was young for AA or AAA or drew a fair share of walks in the minors. There are no Kyle Hendricks, Yu Darvish, Luis Castillo or Sonny Grays in the minor leagues. With the Brewers he's going to have to hit his way on board against these type of pitchers because they don't hand out a lot of walks to begin with. Moreover, his percent of line drive's so far is in line with Orlando Arcia's percentage. To me, it unfortunately seems like Urias is a younger version with maybe "potential" to be an average hitter. Not a terrible player to have on your club, but not necessarily one that an organization should be giving up equally young talent to acquire. Which brings us back to the trade, the main difference between Grisham and Urias is that Grisham had already experienced some success at the major league level at the time of the trade, while Urias had not. Grisham and Davies have proven they are the better players right now. Accordingly, there is no way to grade this trade in September of 2020 as anything other than a major gaffe for Milwaukee (which goes without mentioning players like Topa, Ray Black, Feyereisen have all since passed Lauer on the depth chart, and the lack of quality OF depth has lead to significant playing time in the OF being soaked up by Mathias, Sogard, Holt, Peterson etc). Could Urias and Lauer develop further and make this trade a huge win for the Brewers? Sure anything is possible, but its also likely what you see is what they got. Nobody knows.