So, I’ve been out of country for the last two weeks and not really paying attention to baseball until I got back last night. As it happens, that was fortuitous timing, as it seems the Crew is playing the worst ball of the season thus far. Considering this, I may sound a bit like a new recruit getting cycled into a battle-hardened unit of veterans (“you weren’t there, man!” and all that), but my first thought is: did everyone think this wasn’t going to happen at some point? This is baseball. Remember the five game sweep by the Pirates last year? What if the brass would have done something crazy like dealing Yelich at that point? What a tragedy, and we all may have never even known what we missed. My other thought is: the growth of baseball players and teams is often not linear. I know the comparison is far too pat, with Stearns’ former connections to the organization and the fact that Houston is now a far more accomplished franchise, but I’m reminded of the 2016 Astros. They were coming off a rousing completion of their rebuild, made a nice little playoff run the year before, had a great core intact, and expectations were high. Instead, they took a surprising step backwards and finished a distant third in their division, missing the playoffs entirely. Now, of course, they knew they still had something special, kept making improvements, and have had a great couple of years since, highlighted by a title. So I have to admit I’m floored by the talk of selling at this point. That is an astoundingly premature take on the situation, I think. Sure, I get this is the IGT, but c’mon. There will be plenty of time before the trade deadline to further evaluate the team’s potential this season, and the Crew shouldn’t do anything to jeopardize next year under any circumstances. That would be the height of foolishness, and I see no reason to fear such foolishness from this organization at this point. Let’s wait and see. EDIT: and re-reading this, I want to be clear that I’m not accusing anyone of seriously advocating dealing Yelich, but rather bringing up a hypothetical from last year’s low point for effect. Forgive the rhetorical excess.