I wish they would just go ahead and actually define the MVP award. The debates about something that everyone defines differently drives me crazy because no one's actually discussing the same topic, lol. So until it's defined, I can't argue against someone that thinks it should only go towards someone on a playoff team, but I don't really understand saying a player isn't "valuable enough to not have their team finish 4th in their division," when that player is leading the MLB in WAR. Taking Trout off the Angels and replacing him with any other player in the MLB wouldn't improve that team, therefore no player is "valuable enough to not have their team finish 4th in their division" and I guess no player in baseball should be MVP?