I'll echo what everyone else has said...Palm is just being stubborn here. And I've addressed him on Twitter about it and he has actually responded...with snide comments. He's one of the worst "bracket experts" out there, I saw on another Badger forum that he's in the bottom 25% of "experts" that put out brackets. He's almost entirely driven by the RPI, which while still meaningful, isn't the end all be all as far as seedings go. Kenpom and the BPI are things that the committee looks at too. And these are human beings, despite what they say, I still think it matters how a team plays and that big wins (especially on the road) highly outweigh bad losses. Palm has basically just taken a hardline stance on the Badgers the last 2 months, and he's backed himself into a corner. I think he felt they'd lose some games and he'd be proven "right" but that hasn't happened and his stance has made him look silly but he has no real choice but to defend it now. He also went to Purdue, so maybe he has a bias You guys are all correct on the "bad" losses. Are losses to Marq, GTown and NW good...not really. But they aren't horrible either. Is he giving equal weight to beating Sienna and Penn State, as those two are slightly inside the top 100. to have that hard of a stance and say inside 100 is good and a team at 105 is bad is just flat out silly. Marquette and Georgetown could both sneak into the top 100 with a win or two (they play each other tonight), does that suddenly negate that? Lunardi and some of the others are much more accurate, and they already have Wisconsin in the 6-7 range. Lunardi was asked on Twitter about WI last night and he said they are a lock for the tournament, no matter what happens in the next 3. Palm sill refuses to believe that, but I have to imagine he's going to eat some serious crow on Twitter - fans are all over him in the comments of every single article he rights about WI.