Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

Brock Beauchamp

Site Manager
  • Posts

    6,648
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    47

 Content Type 

Profiles

Forums

Blogs

Events

News

2026 Milwaukee Brewers Top Prospects Ranking

Milwaukee Brewers Videos

2022 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

Milwaukee Brewers Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

2024 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

The Milwaukee Brewers Players Project

2025 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Pick Tracker

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Brock Beauchamp

  1. There is always a section of the internet that wants a place like this to discuss a topic. It’s our core mission to provide that to those users, I just wish we didn’t have to spend so much effort keeping it that way.
  2. We'll definitely monitor the situation and if people start trolling with the reaction, it'll be removed. It's a fine line to walk. Most social communities have some way to "dissent" without lengthy commentary but if people can't resist abusing the feature, I won't hesitate to remove it. I wish people on the internet were capable of acting like grown-ass adults instead of middle schoolers.
  3. This is an oversimplification of the situation. Other sports have banned various defensive alignments multiple times. The NBA banned zone defense for a long time. In the NHL, for decades there were all sorts of rules involving players in the crease.
  4. After some input I received, I shuffled some of the reactions a little. The heart icon for Like has been replaced by a thumbs up. The heart icon has been moved to a new reaction, Love. The Confused reaction has been changed to a Disagree with a thumbs down icon. That feels less confrontational than other neutral or negative reactions. Please give your input on what you think of these, they're absolutely not set in stone.
  5. Could everyone answer two questions: What's your favorite pre-game food? What's your favorite in-game food? I know the food selection at AmFam isn't great but there has to be something some of you like. But also, why is the food selection so bad? I thought we were past that era of the baseball experience.
  6. That makes sense. Wong is a capable fielder, gets his feet under him, and makes clean throws. Saying his arm is the worst at the position is definitely an over-simplification, I just didn't realize it graded out that weakly in StatCast. Overall, I'm hoping the shift reduction brings second base back to relevance in the game a bit more. Obviously, we won't see a flood of slap-hitters return to the game but seeing more athleticism at the position is a welcome return.
  7. Outstanding research and analysis as always, Matt. I never even realized Wong's arm was that bad. I knew it wasn't good but woof.
  8. I don't think that's really fair. Sheets is second in Brewers history in bWAR and I'm pretty sure he's way ahead in fWAR. The caveat being that historically, the "best" career Brewers starters list is pretty woof.
  9. We're working on a MUCH better way to do this but unfortunately, it's not ready yet. When we do our first update some time in May, a new system will be in place that allows you all to drag and drop names in the order you prefer then click submit. It's going to save all of us a ton of time and effort on these lists. But... it's time to start talking about the 2023 list despite that new feature not being ready for prime time quite yet. Here is the current list for reference: https://brewerfanatic.com/milwaukee-brewers-top-prospect-rankings/ We only care about the top 20 but feel free to go as deep as you want! I think we'll close voting on this on Sunday, February 12th. Thanks again, all!
  10. It's entirely possible it would take a massive guaranteed year. Maybe even that doesn't do it.
  11. I'd probably have to go with Sheets over Woodruff, maybe even Burnes. Sheets had the single season of dominance that Burnes had but also combined that with a longer track record of very good pitching than Woody has, at least so far.
  12. Oh, I think it's a long shot but it's the kind of outside-the-box thinking I'd like to see the Brewers at least try. If you guarantee Burnes a hefty payday in 2024 and 2025, it's insurance against arm/shoulder trouble. Maybe he brushes off the team immediately but it's not like it's an insulting offer. You're basically guaranteeing him over $30m with the team upside being you get him for $20-25m more for one season if he stays healthy.
  13. It probably makes his path a bit harder simply because the coaching staff isn't watching him warm up, take BP, field, etc. for a few weeks. That's how teams do most of their evaluation during spring training and not being there is a disadvantage.
  14. Yeah, an extension at this point in the game is really rare. The player is past the point of getting them for pennies on the dollar but still not close enough to free agency to demand a payday well in excess of $100m. The Brewers kinda screwed up by not getting one of the big three locked down last offseason before the stability of a new CBA sent MLB dollars into looney tunes land.
  15. A week or two ago, I floated an entirely absurd idea about Burnes that IMO, is worth throwing at the wall to see if it sticks. Offer to buy out his remaining arb seasons at a fair guaranteed rate, then offer a one year $35-40m option with something like a $15m buyout. The team gets one more year of Burnes to offset the difficulty of losing Burnes, Adames, and Woodruff in a single season while Burnes gets a guaranteed payday should something go horrifically wrong in the next 24 months.
  16. Welcome to Brewer Fanatic!
  17. To be fair to Taylor, he had a really nice 2022 season. I’m not a big fan of him being a starter but he accumulated 2.1 WAR in about 400 PAs.
  18. Let me be the first to welcome Matt to the site. You're all going to love his detailed, thoughtful analysis of baseball.
  19. Huh. An interesting note about the 96th percentile arm. It will be interesting to see if that moves downward with more playing time.
  20. I don't know if there's anything Mitchell can show in ST to change his evaluations. Given his high K rate against MLB pitching, that doesn't translate well to spring training games when good pitchers walk to the mound saying "I'm going to throw my not-great changeup 40% of the time today" or batters get to face AAA pitchers with no real shot at pitching more than a handful of innings in the regular season. Mitchell could look fantastic in spring training by feasting on bad/in-process pitches and have absolutely none of it translate to the regular season. Which is kinda why I'm leaning toward putting him out there to start the season; give him another legit shot and see what happens but be prepared to pivot to Frelick in a hurry.
  21. I generally agree with this. There just isn't a ton of upside of pushing Frelick right to the majors at the expense of Mitchell for less than a month of play. Mitchell's peripherals terrify me and I'm pretty low on him overall but he held his own last season, enough to put him first in line to start this season.
  22. Heheheh, great podcast, wanted to support them.
  23. I'm a big advocate of baseball stadiums being right in the heart of a metro area, which I find frustrating about AmFam. But that's just me, I'm not a big tailgater. I love parks like Petco and Target Field largely because they're so walkable. You find a way to get to the area and then do a bunch of stuff sans car.
×
×
  • Create New...