I agree overall. But look at this way, Henson at roughly 3/30 or Rose at the same, or even only a two year deal instead. I for sure would go Rose, and I hate Rose. Henson can't even get on the floor. If we give some ridiculous 4 year deal though for 15+ mil it's a huge mistake. I can live with sunk cost. Henson is an absolute waste of money, but outside of consuming resources, he doesn't typically detract from the team. They would be signing Rose to play him. If the Bucks wanted a ball dominant player who can't shoot, they could have kept MCW, or Brandon Knight. Really all they need from the PG position is defense, and the ability to hit open 3s. Rose made his money driving the lane, and his license has expired. I could live with bringing nothing to the table, but he takes a lot off. He would instantly replace Corey Maggette as my least favorite Buck. Although, this would be quite the testament to Hammond...even if you're gone, we'll still make terrible free agent signings in your honor...