Continuing our initial discussion above within this thread:
What will be the impact if MKE, SF, SEA, HOU are not going to be allowed to field two stateside complex teams as they did in '22 (Florida for the Astros, Arizona for the others). As of this post, it does not seem MLB will be approving dual squads in 2023, but we shall see. Specific to the Brewers and MLB rules, organizations must limit the number of players in their stateside system to 180 players in-season (AAA, AA, High-A, A, and Rookie Complex). Dominican Complex players are exempt from this count. Note: while not confirmed, it would seem likely that placing a minor league player on one of the extended injured list designations would free up a spot, similar to the 60-day injured list on the MLB level. However, the count is allowed to be 190 players during the offseason. If you add up all the players listed on the MiLB roster pages for the Brewers at those levels, it currently sits exactly at 190 (no, did not count restricted list RHP Ray Black, nor naturally, players on the team's 40-man who have already been optioned). Unlike some organizations who are in the 160-170 range, Milwaukee does push the upper limits of retention, which is fine. Get eyes on as many players as possible, unearth and develop gems within. Current as of 3/19:
Nashville 32
Biloxi 28
Wisconsin 33
Carolina 37
Maryvale Gold 27
Maryvale Blue 33
As noted, the Brewers can seemingly pack their complex league rosters, and boy, have they done so. Let's compare with their chief MLB rival in St. Louis.
The Cardinals currently have 46 players on their one (crowded as of now) Florida Complex League roster, compared to 60 combined on the Brewers' two Maryvale rosters. Remember, those players count towards the 180/190 stateside limits.
St. Louis also takes a minimalist approach in the Dominican, one of only a few organizations fielding only one team there in 2022. Their current DSL roster is bloated for just one squad at 41 currently. Compare that to the 72 DSL Brewers currently listed on the DSL Brewers 1 and DSL Brewers 2 teams.
But here's a kicker for the Brewers (and we imagine all organizations), the 29 signees announced on the international signing day back in January have yet to be placed on a DSL Brewers roster. Suddenly the DSL number goes from 72 to 101 (!). Third DSL team, anyone? Yeah, that's not happening.
Nobody is rooting for player releases, it's one reason we at BrewerFanatic have always made especially sure to acknowledge the accomplishments of those who are let go, no matter how minimal or non-descript the numbers may have been. Hey, they are professional ballplayers, we here at the keyboard were not...
But boy, this looks as though it's going to be a seismic release season in setting up rosters for the full-season clubs in April, and then again in setting up the complex teams in June.
The fact that the Brewers have 60 players currently listed as "Maryvale" with not much room for current promotion at Carolina and Wisconsin is one issue. But if MLB does not allow for a 2nd Maryvale team to compete, the crowd at that level is exasperated even before one accounts for the mass of players potentially needed to come stateside from the Dominican League.
Once the full-season teams break camp and rosters are set in April, it's going to be a wild two-month scramble of Arizona complex competition to see who maintains spots in the organization in June.
The dynamic completely changes if Milwaukee is allowed to field a second team in Arizona. If not allowed, watch out.