Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

Scooterfletcher

Verified Member
  • Posts

    878
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Forums

Blogs

Events

News

2026 Milwaukee Brewers Top Prospects Ranking

Milwaukee Brewers Videos

2022 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

Milwaukee Brewers Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

2024 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

The Milwaukee Brewers Players Project

2025 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Pick Tracker

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Scooterfletcher

  1. If the brewers are confident in wilken and Adams defensively at 3rd, I’m ok with Mayo focusing on first base. My offer would be DL Hall back in their system, along with Carlos Rodriguez (p) and Ernesto Martinez. CRod not being healthy at the moment might make this a non starter though. But that’s a deal they’d have to consider otherwise .
  2. Hall for Fitzgerald I’d imagine they’d accept and might be better for us long term anyway. From mlbtr on their needs Potential needs: first base, second base, mid-rotation starter, left-handed relief With these needs above in mind, would Hudson, Bauers, and a lesser starting pitching prospect like pipeline #29 Manuel Rodriguez be enough for Fitzgerald? I’d do that one over the Hall trade if both would be acceptable.? ETA that we clear a 40 man spot in this one which could be helpful.
  3. I brought up Fitz and Candelario because they had a recent transaction potentially making them cheap adds if not free. My goal wasn’t to start a trend of making everyone in baseball getting their own thread as to their worthiness of brewer kingdom.
  4. Dl Hall for Fitzgerald who says no?
  5. Nate I kind of agree, but are you one that wants to pay 2-3 likable prospects for McMahon or Suarez? Personally I stand Pat.
  6. I’m ok whatever we do but put it this way…. We can roll with Durbin and we might be fine. But to give up prospects for Suarez or McMahon when we have the ability to get Candelario super cheap for no prospects, that’s gonna irk me. All have warts mind you. Maybe we add none of the three (most likely) but if we can get Candelario for a million or so (if we want to try add to the left side of the IF at some point) I’d prefer this option. I’m cool rolling with Durbin though but then don’t go after Suarez or McMahon imo.
  7. Optioned to AAA today. What would we want to offer San Fran to add him to our infield mix?
  8. Yep getting a 40 hr hitter at a position of a need for a year isn’t worth a AAAA pitcher like Myers Big Nate.
  9. Tobias Myers for Suarez might be of interest to the dbacks. Straight up.
  10. We have a plethora of 3B types close but not there yet. I’m inquiring about names like Zach Neto, Jordan Lawler, etc. Guys that are ready to go now but their team may have a 3B to handle the job at least this year and would love Peralta and be high on their incumbents soon replacement (Wilken or Adams in this case). Is there any young stud other than these two that might be intrigued by an offer of Peralta and one of these two?
  11. I would be open to dealing Peralta and Luke Adams for Lawler. I’d prefer Peralta and Boeve and a 20-30 prospect instead though.
  12. Peralta for Suarez and Yilber Diaz. Who says no?
  13. For guys we might want: Luis Rengifo Angels can play 3rd and middle infield. Generally has been a plus war guy and can hit for average quite well typically. Free agent to be so the cost should be something like Zavier Warren maybe. Luis Urias As is an old friend that has done fairly well this year and can play all over the infield. An upgrade on Monty at worst and at best rotates in around the IF or replaces a slumping bat. Should cost nothing more than a lotto ticket or two. These are the two names I most see helping accentuate our infield prowess by deadline time.
  14. I’m old enough to remember when Doug Davis and then Randy Wolf served as our number two starters. Oh how I’d have longed for having Civale or an end-of-career Quintana handling the #2 starter roles on those Brewer teams instead.
  15. People mention Urias from Baltimore while acknowledging he will cost something we may not want to part with since he has 1.5 years control left. Id honestly rather bring back “old friend” Luis Urias from Oakland. Never thought he was that bad even at his worst (end of his brewer tenure). Trade a guy or two we haven’t yet committed to adding to the 40 man in the fall for Luis rather than lose a guy or two in the rule 5 draft (Seth Smith vibes ) would be my plan.
  16. Initially was speculated to be Whitcomb but that was wrong as he simply got called up to Houston. We are just simply receiving cash in the trade, no player.
  17. We will definitely do minor adds. Something like Luis Rengifo I can see. But I don’t see a difference maker being added. Depth of the league average type is what I see.
  18. We can see how this Cards and the following Cubs series goes, but if we don’t go above .500, the next six games, I almost feel this is the year to trade Peralta and see if we can still make the playoffs as a WC. Trading Peralta won’t mean we can’t grab a WC spot. Trade Civale and Quintana as well as Peralta and go with; Miz, Henderson, Patrick, Ashby, Hall, CRod ans your rotation choices and see what happens in July/August/September. Plus whatever MLB ready arm we might get via the aforementioned trades. It seems we should be above .500 anyway and maybe can grab a WC slot while setting us up incredibly well next year and beyond. But if we go 5-1 or even 4-2 the next six games, I have a right to re evaluate my position here.
  19. I think we need to look at getting something better than a lottery ticket but that won’t require a 40 man roster spot as of yet in a Civale trade. We are gonna be pinched for our 40 man as is and have a rather high likelihood of losing the top pick in the rule 5 draft next year as is. If we can get an organization’s top 10-15 prospect AND one sitting in A ball currently, that may well be the best case scenario for us.
  20. Controlled through 2030. Can we get him for a package of guys like Boeve Lara black, wichowski or too little?
  21. No, but before this season we probably would have. Hoskins is having an all star year though and is owed less money which is key too.
  22. Ok, a failed first round pick I can be forced to accept reluctantly….But this kid was treated by the Yankees as a toy and is beyond killing it in AAA for Nashville. While Oliver Dunn is sitting with a horrid OPS in Nashville after getting a multitude of chances at 3B for us, Seigler is dominating AAA. Lets look at him in Mil before giving value for a league average incumbent.
  23. Perkins I am guessing only comes up from AAA if injuries hit. I think Collins keeps the 5th OF job and the two battle it out next year for a reserve role. Mitchell rotates in the OF with Chourio/Yelich/Frelick.
  24. Welcome the the BF kind sir, but not a phenomenal first post. Arizona would accept in a millisecond and Milwaukee would offer less than half of your agreed upon proposal. Edited to add unless you meant just one of the three and not all three along with Peralta. If the idea is Peralta and ONE of those three, that’s about what we should be offering in theory.
  25. Lawlar being 0 for 19 in the bigs certainly can’t hurt the chances of obtaining him at the moment, however brief the moment is.
×
×
  • Create New...