Not sure why people believe an owner's personal wealth has anything to do with how much should be spent on payroll. I work for a company with one 100% owner and 7 other employees. Yes, much different scale, but the owner has never reached into his own pockets to help pay for employee salaries, rent, etc and I would not expect him to. If Musk, Bezos, or Buffett owned the Brewers, that would not change the Brewer's payroll. They would not reach into their own personal wealth to pay for player salaries. Sounds like some people would rather have the Brewers move than spend "one more penny" of tax payer dollars. Do you think the Brewers add zero value to the community? Do you not think that it's amazing that Milwaukee, with the 40th ranked metropolitan area population in the U.S. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metropolitan_statistical_area), has a MLB baseball team?! I get the anger at paying taxes for a place for a team owned by a millionaire with millionaire ballplayers to play. Your arguments are not invalid. However A) Tax subsidies are provided by states to companies all the time in order to incentivize them to stay in the state or come to the state (yes, I understand that there are some mixed results to these incentives), and B) Are you willing to possibly, at some point down the road, let the Brewers go to a city that will provide the Brewers with what they are looking for? This is Brewerfan, right?