Sorry, I really couldn't disagree more. The astounding number of players who have come in here and underperformed expectation/career norms, young players who haven't developed properly, etc. isn't indicative of talent evaluation, it's coaching. Sorry, if you're not willing to concede that Stearns has had a poor go of it the last year and a half or so, I just don't think you're looking at things as an impartial observer. The Urias trade as of today is somewhere between bad and disaster. It obviously could end up in a better spot or a worse spot. The Yelich extension, at the very least, is looking like something Stearns probably wishes he had a mulligan on, with the potential to be a disaster. Almost every minor move made since the end of '19 has been somewhere between neutral and bad, with a few exceptions. Sogard was bad. Smoak was bad. JBJ has been very bad. These guys are longtime veterans, I don't buy that after years in the league they are getting here and our coaches are just messing them up. Moose, Gandalf, Thames, Hiura, Braun, these guys all hit just fine in '19 under the same coaches. I don't doubt that there are some things that need to be looked at deeper within our system from a developmental standpoint, but to hold Stearns blameless I think is missing part of the equation. Just because he did a great job in the past does not necessarily mean he will always do a great job, nor does a player's career stats indicate he will always perform at that level. Stearns had some wonderful years and the last couple have been very poor, both of these things can be true. I have no problem with firing Andy Haines, in fact it should probably happen, but I have a hard time believing that it's his fault that Jackie Bradley Jr. suddenly can't hit.