adambr2

Not sure what you are expecting out of our fans. Sure some Cardinal fans are arrogant as with any franchise but there's no question that they are an accomplished franchise with a lot of history. If they want to take pride in that part of it like Packer fans do too, sure, go nuts. I absolutely have no problem with fans thinking that we're a better and superior organization to others. I feel that way, too. I'm not going to tell someone how they should or shouldn't be a fan if they love their team. Hate a draft? Go ahead, vent. Want to see a coach or coordinator replaced? You have the right to feel that way. When Packer fans start pelting players with beer bottles and cheering opposing team injuries then I'll start to be disappointed in our fan base. Until then there's nothing they've done to make me feel that way.

We have a very good fan base. Every fan base has fans that fall in love with their favorites, hate on drafts, and irrationally (or sometimes rationally) criticize the FO. Every, single, one. All you can realistically ask for from a fan base is that they passionately support their team and fill the stadium. And we have that.

I literally can't think of one instance where I recall a Packer fan upset that we dumped Kumerow.

Washington's defense is really letting them down. Which is not the way I saw them losing this game.

Garcia is indeed a good candidate for a rebound season, I agree with that. I also agree his trade value is negative relative to his contract.

At times they look great. I'd like to see them gel against a team that isn't the Detroit Pistons.

If he is willing to come back for cheap, I would guess they'll have a spot for him. It's just a matter of whether he wants to continue playing badly enough to take an enormous haircut on his salary.

Whatever, we signed Pablo Reyes this morning.

That one I did have a big problem with. Your offensive line worked very hard to make sure that that record didn't happen on their watch and you just hand it to an opponent. Also, I would look at any record obtained this way a little differently than an incentive. If that was David Moore's 150th catch of the season and he obtained it that way in a victory formation time I would have had a lot more issue with it.

I doubt anyone was even aware of it until the end. I'm sure Moore was not reminding people about the clause hoping to get the ball, and it was a competitive game with a lot at stake where I'm sure the Seahawks had bigger things in mind most of the game than individual incentives. You really wouldn't force a play like that until garbage time. I don't have a problem with it at all. I still would have found a jumped route and pick 6 to be hilarious, though.

Hopefully the Allen family can find a way to make ends meet without that 100K.

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/eagles-players-reportedly-had-restrained-170940811.html Losing the respect of your team is a big, big thing. There's no way I'll be convinced that this Doug Pederson/Sudfeld/Hurts thing is just a big nothing burger that won't matter next year.

Coan is probably a borderline backup QB talent at the NFL level, so if he wants to pursue that as a career it definitely makes sense for him to maximize his opportunities now. He won't do that here behind Mertz. I wish Coan well.

Remember back in Spring/Summer when you were around someone who was around someone who POSSIBLY had COVID-19 and you were telling your contacts, "Hey, I saw Jim a few days ago. Yeah he was around Sally last week and she was at a party with people who tested positive. You may want to get checked." Now it's so widespread that it's "Oh yeah, I saw Jim a few days ago. Yeah, he's positive, I'm pretty sure. Yeah, I didn't even think of that."

After reading about how much of a problem fumbling has been for Tavon Austin in his career I am already ready to move on. Austin has fumbled TWENTY THREE times in his NFL career. Think of how little he touches the ball as a role player compared to high usage starters, and yet he puts the ball on the turf that much. I'm sorry, that is a terrible fit for this team. We don't need a flashy gamebreaking return man. We literally just need a guy who can put his hand up and catch the ball. The most likely we won't be playing in the Super Bowl is if we beat ourselves.

Yeah the race card is not a good look on this one. Had you used Jim Caldwell/Matt Patricia as your example I could see that. Lynn is also so woefully inept at clock management that that alone is a serious detriment to his ability to coach a team.

The guy who caught the pass was one catch away from triggering a contract bonus. That one additional catch made him $500,000. I'd venture to guess Wilson takes a knee if he's not open and that a bigger brawl isn't started because many on SF probably knew the deal. I heard it was $100K, but I guess Wilson did it on his own and Pete didn't know about it. Either way, after hearing the full story I have no issue with it and I doubt the 49ers do either.

Even that 2011 Packer team was kind of a paper tiger as much as a 15-1 team can be a paper tiger. The offense was awesome. But that defense was so horrendous that they would be vulnerable in any game where they had any kind of offensive letdown. This year's Packer team has a similar offense to 2011, but a much better defense. Our special teams remains a major liability, so we need to minimize their impact on the game as much as we can by taking touchbacks, fair catching, avoiding returns on both sides when possible, etc.

That one seemed to be fine but the Pettis one was an absolute joke. Oh, you were talking about the Pettis catch? Yeah, they missed the call but Mike had the next 40 seconds to get it reversed and stood there and did nothing. That one is on him.

First of all, Sudfeld has been with the Eagles for 4 years. You're not going to learn anything about him in 1 quarter of regular season action that you don't already know. There's far, far more value in letting Hurts grow and play in that situation than anything you're going to get out of playing Sudfeld. As far as Hurts' stats for the game, that doesn't carry much relevance to me because it implies that Sudfeld gave the team the best chance to win at that point, which we all know isn't true. If it was a game in which Wentz was active and they turned to him I guess you could make the case for the "we went to Wentz because Hurts was struggling and we were trying to win the game", but not Sudfeld. And while Hurts wasn't having a great statistical game, he was doing some damage on the ground which was helping keep them in the game. Washington has one of the best defenses in the NFL. It was a tough matchup and good developmental opportunity. And while yes, Philadelphia is free to pursue their best interests, and no, I don't feel "sorry" for the Giants, their best interests are more complex than their draft position. Yes, in a vacuum it is better for the Eagles to pick 6th rather than 9th, but there's far more to it than that. Think Pederson lost some of the respect of his team last night? These players are competitors. It means something to them, even if it doesn't mean something to Doug. They don't want Washington winning the division on their turf, on their watch, and they went out and competed like it meant something to them. Then Pederson with one move showed them that it didn't matter to him. Think they are going to want to play hard for him the first time they face adversity next season? Think something like that might make a free agent think twice for playing for a guy like him? It is not a game of Madden and there is likely to be residual damage caused from last night that is more harmful than picking 3 spots lower.

Every single person in the stadium knew they were going to hard count besides the Eagles' defensive line.

Yeah, no matter what else he says, this is nothing more than a petty bush league move by Doug Pederson to stick it to a division rival. There's no logical reason to bench Hurts for Sudfeld. Hurts needs reps in games like this. If you were benching a vet for a young 2nd round rookie, I'd get it. It's not like Sudfeld is your future in any way.

Kelce is mountains ahead of all the others in terms of consistency. He's worth a 1st round pick. I think I'd wait if you don't get him. Maybe Kittle or Waller in the 3rd but it could be a crap shoot after.

Still a 6 point game. Of course that's a mountain to climb if Doug plans on sticking with Nate Sudfeld.

It's not a good sign for the Bears when their game is on Nickelodeon.