Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

adambr2

Verified Member
  • Posts

    34,944
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    54

 Content Type 

Profiles

Forums

Blogs

Events

News

2026 Milwaukee Brewers Top Prospects Ranking

Milwaukee Brewers Videos

2022 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

Milwaukee Brewers Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

2024 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

The Milwaukee Brewers Players Project

2025 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Pick Tracker

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by adambr2

  1. Gotta start swinging the bat and stop griping about the outside corner. He is hitting it.
  2. I don’t particularly enjoy watching any Brewer player the past two weeks, but here I am parked in front of the TV again.
  3. Ump sucks and isn’t consistent. We don’t have that strong of a case though on those pitches to Yelich. Bieber dotted.
  4. I know you’re not alone, but the numbers don’t lie, and they say he’s the best starting pitcher on our staff and that it isn’t particularly close.
  5. Trust me, we’re not trying to get our #1 tossed in the 3rd inning at this point of the season.
  6. So just below the bottom of the zone is a strike for Bieber, but not Peralta. Got it, ump.
  7. One thing I think we can agree on: The Milwaukee Brewers would never, never make a trade like this. Apples and oranges, I know.
  8. And I’ve definitely always been of the belief that on the defensive side of the ball, for winning a Super Bowl, pass rush trumps everything. Not stopping the run. Not coverage. Pass rush.
  9. The two 1st do get tricky to gauge because two 1sts from one team mean so much more than from another. Bears got a 1st from Carolina that turned out to be 1.01. If the Packers pick 29th and 23rd the next two years which is probably a pretty fair guess, that’s equal to one 1st at #8 overall in value.
  10. If there’s a great argument to be made about the Packers trading a pair of 1sts, it’s that they kind of suck at drafting in the first.
  11. You don’t see how not having two 1st round picks to build the team with (regardless of position, which certainly isn’t guaranteed), eating as much dead money dealing Clark as they did, and investing as much as they did in Parsons, couldn’t look really, really bad in a few years? Again, not saying they shouldn’t have. But there are numerous different ways it could blow up in their face.
  12. Giving up two 1sts and Clark just to be able to have the privilege to pay QB money to Parsons is indeed an enormous price and investment. I'm not saying they shouldn’t have. I’m just saying it’s a deal that could look really, really bad in a few years. Or the deal that won them a Super Bowl. We will see.
  13. I love the deal, I’m glad they did it, and I certainly understand it. It’s exciting I think it turning out to be a total Russ Wilson catastrophe are about as good of it resulting in a Super Bowl win, though. I do understand the risk.
  14. The deal works better for the Packers if they keep Gary — obviously hoping it’ll open things up for him too. LVN becoming a thing is pretty much dead in the water though.
×
×
  • Create New...