This is the same distortion we've talked about earlier. If the Stearns approach is quickly turning a pile of garbage into a winning team, you'd also have to admit the Stearns approach includes trading away major league talent for little or no return. Stearns did jettison, Khris Davis, Will Smith, Scooter Gennett, Martin Maldonado for little or no return. He sold low on Jean Segura. Adam Lind could also be included if we've already seen the best of Freddy Peralta. He also spun off the prospects he acquired in the Lucroy trade for a handful of veteran rentals. The preceding shouldn't be construed as a slam on David Stearns in any way. I think he's done an ok job with the hand he was dealt and lwhatever edicts come from ownership. However, I don't think he's a personnel genius either. Nelson and Anderson having career seasons in 2017 is more likely than not the main reason the team jumped into being competitive, as opposed to any sort of master plan implemented by the GM. There's plenty of truth to your statement...one characteristic of Stearns seems to be the high volume of moves, for better or worse. And yes, the "master plan" to 2017 was to throw a bunch of darts at a board and see what stuck. Two of the top 3 offensive players from 2017 were some of those darts--Shaw and Thames. This year the top 5 offensive producers are all Stearns guys. It's not clear what will come out of the farm system from the Stearns era yet. Will it cost us that we traded all these guys away? Or was it a smart way of getting value while solving the 40-man roster crunch? I don't know, but we clearly made moves to try and get a leg up on the wild card chase. So far only 1 of the 3 major moves has worked out. Making the playoffs or not doesn't change the bigger picture. Even if we make the playoffs, we have a 50/50 chance of being eliminated in one game (unless we somehow miraculously top the Cubs which was never part of the plan).