Of course the test was ruled invalid; but even that seems pretty questionable given that at this point because the error wasn't that outrageous and there has been no proof that the sample was tainted, that it wasn't properly stored, or that it was degraded when it got to Montreal. Maybe the only reason Das ruled in favor of Braun was because the sample was kept at the guys house for 44 hours; if that really is the only reason that is incredibly weak in the absense of any kind of proof that the sample was tampered with, incorrectly stored, etc. Maybe just the fact that the sample sat there for 44 hours was enough for Braun to win but it certainly doesn't instill any confidence in me that Braun didn't do anything. There needs to be something more. I know the chain of custody thing has beem hammered home here quite a bit and it certianly is good cause for winning the appeal; but it does nothing to show Braun's innocence because there has been no evidence at all the the chain in custody breach resulted in altering the outcome of the test. Sure Braun can't 100% prove that it altered his test but at the very least inquiring minds would like to know how it is possible that the 44 hour window changed the outcome of the test. To this point only Will Carrol has attempted to go down that road and I don't buy that other media organizations aren't pursuing that angle purely for sketchy reasons. If they had reason to believe that Will Carroll's info was accurate I am sure they would run the information. The Carroll stuff has been out for 3-4 days now and there has to be a reason no one else is reporting on it other than it doesn't fit there story profile.