Why does it seem that just a few understand that this team lost two all-star pitchers from their rotation? It's not hard to understand why they're struggling. I have been asking myself the same question lately. Three things: 1. Yo probably for the most part, has probably replaced Sheets. I think everyone understands that CC's performance in 2008, was unrepeatable -- even by himself -- that said, we really didn't need our "ace" to replicate a 1.65 ERA over 17 starts. If you think about it, if your team averages 4 runs a game, how many more wins does a 2.65 pitcher win over a 1.65 pitcher. 2. Bush and Parra - have really fell far from their projections, and Suppan and Looper have as well to a lesser degree. 2009 is really not about missing two spots in the rotation, it really is about all 5 spots slipping. 3. I think the other variable in our rotation is that in 2008, besides Sheets, Yo, CC, Bush, Suppan & Parra -- the only Brewers to start games in 2008 were CV and McClung -- while neither McClung or CV are super, they are certainly servicable in a pinch -- In 2009 we have already had 5 starts by Mike Burns, and will probably see some more starts if not by Burns, someone of his caliber. In short 2009 is not entirely about "2008Brewers rotation - Sheets - CC = crap" -- our rotation has really slipped on a lot of fronts.