I can admit to doing that... and hadn't realized I did it enough to carry it as a label. Much too frequently you go to the OMG well young jedi, Mmmmm /yoda sample size be damned. I would like to use the mighty roller coaster as an illustration. http://www.funonthenet.in/images/stories/forwards/Roller-Coaster/roller-coaster-2.jpg Now, any segment of track of a roller coaster can be considered a small sample of the overall experience -- yet you clearly see different reactions to said sample. Perhaps the young lady in the front is overreacting, or perhaps she has a better grip on the principles of roller coaster construction than the morons in the back, and realizes that due to shoddy assembly they are all about to go hurtling to their deaths through the stock pavilion. At the end of the day, or roller coaster crash, all these people are riding the same wagon, and paid the same ticket price. I took moofnelson's thread as simply a frustrated cry for some kind of positive juju, so I posted what I did... note that 'OMG' is nowhere to be found, and furthermore I think I took him very seriously. I think you did well in this thread -- I think others were referring to past transgressions... I think your point was valid, we still have Prince and Braun and Yo, and those guys should be able to get us on track hopefully. If the tradeoff for pointing out the absurdity of negative overreactions is to get called the OMG guy, I guess that's that. Dude, you are too well-rounded of a poster, and top-shelf quality of a guy, to anchor yourself with being the board OMG guy. A board probably only needs one OMG guy, and frankly Ennder does a much better job of being the condescending OMG guy than you. Please rethink this. Once you start down the OMG path, forever will it dominate your destiny, consume you it will. -- Yoda