Greg keeps responding in fine fashion to the posts that irk me, so I won't bother. A couple of points however: 1. If you don't yet understand that telling people to "get over it" is not done here, you're not going to last long. 2. It's arguable that Linebrink will have little affect in whether the Brewers make the playoffs or not. 3. The pro-trade group can't seem to understand the problems that those less enthusiastic have. Namely: - It's not about giving up Inman or not, it's who we're getting back. If this trade is for a Gagne-level stud, I think no one cares. And maybe Linebrink will revert back and everyone will be happy. To quote SeriesFinale: "I'm not averse to them trading Inman for the right guy in the right situation. I just don't think that Linebrink is that guy." - This year is not an all or nothing proposition. It's really possible to want to win this year AND next year (and the year after?). The people complaining about not trading every prospect away to get people for this year would be the same ones complaining in 3 years when the cupboard is bare and we're back below .500 waiting for the next wave of kids to come along. Inman was more than likley 2 years away from the majors in the best case scenario. Inman is Gallardo one year removed. If he's not in the majors in 2 years, he either blew his arm out or couldn't hack it in AAA, and we win this trade. I can't believe everyone hates this deal. What has Innman, Thratcher proved in the majors? Absoutley nothing, Don't stop there! What had Gallardo or Braun proved in the majors last year? Absolutely nothing! That's a completely meaningless argument.