I've been saying pretty much the exact same thing for years, the names change, but the idea doesn't. My opinions are hardly revisionist in nature, people were telling me how wrong I was then, and now I basically get labeled with the revisionist history card. I don't care if people disagree with me as long as they make an effort to understand what I'm saying, but at least be courteous enough to acknowledge that I've been beating the same drum forever. As far as Derek Holland goes, that was another "for instance", I didn't think he was attainable at this time last year, and still think Texas would be better of with him and Feliz in the rotation. The point was that he's a very similar prospect to our own Amaury Rivas, a young man with plenty of talent, who gets good results, but no one was talking about because he's not a "name" prospect. I'll post about players whom I believe may be attainable in the transaction forum, but lately I've mostly even quit doing that as many people don't care and only want to discuss "proven" MLB talent, which I'm personally not interested in acquiring. I'm very tired of arguing the obvious, I'll do it on occassion, but mostly it's pointless endeavor. Finally, young pitching was much easier to acquire when OBP/SLG was all the rage, but now it appears that pitching is so overvalued that there is opportunity coming back around on the position player side of things. However, I'm not sure Milwaukee would be in a position to exploit the market like TB did in the last draft as we still need pitching first and foremost. Until we develop enough pitching (as I don't think Melvin will trade for it) we're always going to be playing catch up.