Game 7 - Packers @ Lions - Sunday, Oct. 25th @ 3:25 PM

[homer]

https://www.jsonline.com/story/sports/nfl/packers/2026/10/25/referee-in-packers-lions-game-responds-to-questions-about-disputed-penalties/92436424007/

Intentional Grounding Call:

Reporter: On the Jordan Love intentional grounding, why was Tucker Kraft not considered the intended receiver on that one?

Moore: “So we ruled that although the quarterback was outside of the tackle box, the pass did not make it to the line of scrimmage. So, that's where the intentional grounding came in.”

Question: “So it doesn't matter if Kraft was the intended receiver or not, the ball has to get to the line of scrimmage?”

Moore: “Either to the line of scrimmage or into the area where he is. It just can't be in the direction, it has to actually reach where he is if it doesn't get to the line of scrimmage.”

Unsportsmanlike Conduct on Wyatt:

Reporter: Did the whistle blow before Wyatt tackled St. Brown?

Moore: “We ruled that the play was over. I can't honestly hear if there was a whistle or not, but the tackler made the tackle, the play was over. Then, there was an additional action, and he basically tackled him again with force after the play was over.”

Wyatt and several players said that no whistle was blown and they were later told that the time in which it took for St. Brown to get up and try to advance the ball could be interpreted as play over.

You know why there was no whistle? Because his knee never hit the ground and he knew it so he tried to get up and run.

[OldSchoolSnapper]

4 minutes ago, homer said:

https://www.jsonline.com/story/sports/nfl/packers/2026/10/25/referee-in-packers-lions-game-responds-to-questions-about-disputed-penalties/92436424007/

Intentional Grounding Call:

Reporter: On the Jordan Love intentional grounding, why was Tucker Kraft not considered the intended receiver on that one?

Moore: “So we ruled that although the quarterback was outside of the tackle box, the pass did not make it to the line of scrimmage. So, that's where the intentional grounding came in.”

Question: “So it doesn't matter if Kraft was the intended receiver or not, the ball has to get to the line of scrimmage?”

Moore: “Either to the line of scrimmage or into the area where he is. It just can't be in the direction, it has to actually reach where he is if it doesn't get to the line of scrimmage.”

Unsportsmanlike Conduct on Wyatt:

Reporter: Did the whistle blow before Wyatt tackled St. Brown?

Moore: “We ruled that the play was over. I can't honestly hear if there was a whistle or not, but the tackler made the tackle, the play was over. Then, there was an additional action, and he basically tackled him again with force after the play was over.”

Wyatt and several players said that no whistle was blown and they were later told that the time in which it took for St. Brown to get up and try to advance the ball could be interpreted as play over.

You know why there was no whistle? Because his knee never hit the ground and he knew it so he tried to get up and run.

Ridiculous and unprofessional play in which the crybaby threw a flag only because he got hit. They can all go. I'm ready for AI. 

[Jopal78]

1 hour ago, adambr2 said:

Theres been a consistent problem with the operation the last 3 years. It isn’t always there, but Orzech (who is statistically usually one of the worst long snappers in the league) has always been the common denominator, no matter the kicker. 

Smack was perfect in pre season working with Adomitis, 

It’s an interesting thought, but I can’t buy in to the fact they gave McManus a $5M guarantee then cut him, burn a draft pick in Smack while really Orzech has been the problem the whole time. 

[yourout]

19 minutes ago, Jopal78 said:

It’s an interesting thought, but I can’t buy in to the fact they gave McManus a $5M guarantee then cut him, burn a draft pick in Smack while really Orzech has been the problem the whole time. 

I would not put it past Packer management.

[adambr2]

5 hours ago, yourout said:

I would not put it past Packer management.

As a Brewer fan, the difference in the quality of management at every level of the organization between the Packers and Brewers is night and day.

[yourout]

41 minutes ago, adambr2 said:

As a Brewer fan, the difference in the quality of management at every level of the organization between the Packers and Brewers is night and day.

The Brewers front office seems quietly exceptionally good at their jobs while the Packers front office seems arrogantly bad at it. Polar opposites.

[adambr2]

1 hour ago, yourout said:

The Brewers front office seems quietly exceptionally good at their jobs while the Packers front office seems arrogantly bad at it. Polar opposites.

Would you give one of your employees a million dollars just to keep him, fire him a month later after giving him the million dollars before he even starts on his next job, hire his replacement, and then watch his replacement do a much worse job? Sound like an efficiently run company?

Well, Brian Gutekunst did that exact thing just this year.