Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic
  • Brewers Minor League Coverage

    Does Biloxi Have The Answer For The Brewers Backup Backstop Blues?


    Harold Hutchison

    The pending return of Gary Sanchez from the injured list has the Brewers in a potentially tough spot due to Eric Haase being out of options. But could a solution to their backup catcher conundrum be available at Biloxi?

    Image courtesy of © Dan Powers/USA TODAY NETWORK-Wisconsin / USA TODAY NETWORK

    Brewers Video

    The 26-Man Roster Crunch
    William Contreras has been a highly durable option for the Brewers at catcher – with Gary Sanchez primarily serving as designated hitter for the Crew. Sanchez has been on the injured list with a left calf strain and could return after the All-Star break. In the meantime, Eric Haase, who was initially on the 40-man, had to be outrighted when he didn’t make the 26-man roster out of spring training due to being out of options.

    When Sanchez returns, Haase is likely to be designated for assignment again, and this time, the Crew will not be as fortunate as they were in March. So, the question is, do they lose Haase for nothing or salvage some return? But a trade could leave them without a backup catcher… or is an answer already in-house?

    Biloxi’s Outstanding On-Base Machine
    Darrien Miller has been one of the more under-the-radar prospects for the Brewers since being drafted in the ninth round in 2019. Jeferson Quero got a lot of attention and is on the prospect lists. Still, since being drafted out of high school, Miller has quietly displayed outstanding on-base skills (195 walks in 1139 professional at-bats through July 10) and, in most years, has flashed some pop in his left-handed bat.

    In 2024, Miller’s formidable on-base skills have taken a quantum leap at Double-A Biloxi. From 2021-2023, including his winter stint at Brisbane, Miller posted a .368 OBP. As a Shucker in 2024, his OBP is .432 through July 10, fueled by 45 walks, and it includes a selection as Hitter of the Month by Brewers Player Development. Miller has also gotten on base the hard way – as of July, he’s been hit 16 times in 2024, with a career total of 67.

    If Miller has an issue, it’s that he’s been unable to keep baserunners from taking larcenous liberties – in his professional career, he’s thrown out just 16% of would-be base stealers. So, in one sense, he is a bat-first catcher, although not to the extent of Satchell Norman. Otherwise, he’s a solid backstop.

    The Case For Selecting Miller
    The Brewers need another catcher on the 40-man to address any additional IL visits by either Sanchez or Contreras – and Contreras may be wearing down and in need of more off days. While most backup backstop issues may be fixed by having Christian Yelich DH more, the Crew needs a backup that can take the shuttle from Milwaukee to Nashville in 2024. Quero was to have been that guy, but his shoulder injury wiped out his 2024 season.

    Miller, though, could be that guy for the Crew and offers additional benefits. His left-handed bat complements the righty bats of Contreras, Quero, and Sanchez. Plus, he will have three option years – and the Crew can use him for the shuttle. If his on-base skills and pop translate to the majors, so much the better for the Crew, they will have plenty of options.

    The Alternatives
    Why Miller over Wes Clarke, Francisco Mejia, and Brian Navarreto? Mejia has a solid case to be added to the 40-man roster – plenty of MLB experience, a switch hitter, substantial pedigree as a top prospect, and playing at Triple-A Nashville.

    The problem with Mejia is that it puts the Brewers in the same position they are in with Haase—Mejia burned his option years in 2018, 2019, and 2020. In August 2023, the Rays outrighted Mejia. The Brewers can do much better than a “lather, rinse, repeat” of the Eric Haase situation. Mejia is a guy who thinks about flipping for help, either in the bullpen or to find a prospect.

    Navarreto’s biggest problem is the bat. It’s nowhere near as good as Miller’s; he is another right-handed hitter. At 29, he is a solid depth option and mentor for catching prospects who make the high minors, but the Brewers can do better regarding MLB options.

    As for Clarke, the potential issue is rust. While he was the primary backup to both Quero and Miller in 2023 and 2022, this year, he has all six games behind the plate. The big reason is that his three-true-outcomes bat made it to Triple-A Nashville, where Haase and Mejia have done the catching. Clarke deserves a 40-man spot due to his bat, but it may need to wait until the offseason.

    Overview
    The fact is, the Brewers have some blues when it comes to a backup catcher for the short term, given Quero’s injury and Haase’s lack of options and vulnerability to the DFA process. The Brewers should look to deal Haase – perhaps to Cleveland, which could use an upgrade at catcher (even if Austin Hedges is more of a coach). The Brewers could give Cleveland an upgrade over Hedges as a player in exchange for Cleveland’s competitive balance pick in the 2024 draft.

    After that deal, the Brewers could then make a call to Biloxi that could fix these backup backstop blues, not just for 2024 but for years down the road.


    Interested in learning more about the Milwaukee Brewers' top prospects? Check out our comprehensive top prospects list that includes up-to-date stats, articles and videos about every prospect, scouting reports, and more!

    View Brewers Top Prospects

    Follow Brewer Fanatic For Milwaukee Brewers News & Analysis

    Recent Brewers Articles

    Recent Brewers Videos

    Brewers Top Prospects

    Brandon Sproat

    Milwaukee Brewers - MLB, RHP
    Sproat had a rough first appearance in a Brewers uniform (3 IP, 7 ER, 3 HR). On Thursday, he gave up one run on 4 hits and a walk over 6 2/3 innings. He struck out six Blue Jays batters.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    a am wondering why not dfa or better yet trade Sanchez - between Yelich, Contreras and Hoskins plenty of DH options and Contreras needs more time off from behind the plate and to me Haase is the better defender than Sanchez. I know the contract is a problem but which completes the team better 

    • Like 2

    The Brewers backup catcher situation is fine, Haase has filled in admirably and Sanchez is on the mend.

    Two things working against Miller getting a 40 Man spot would be his defense (if he can only catch 19% of Southern League base stealers what will that percentage shrink to two levels up in MLB?) and his offense (MLB pitchers won’t be walking him 19.8% of the time or beaning him 6.5% of the time so there goes all his value at the plate since he doesn’t hit for average or slug).

    50 minutes ago, clancyphile said:

    Clarke deserves a 40-man spot due to his bat,

    Clarke has a 90 wRC+ and 37.2% K rate in AAA, in what world does that kind of production warrant a 40 Man spot?

    • Like 6
    16 minutes ago, notimelikenow said:

    a am wondering why not dfa or better yet trade Sanchez - between Yelich, Contreras and Hoskins plenty of DH options and Contreras needs more time off from behind the plate and to me Haase is the better defender than Sanchez. I know the contract is a problem but which completes the team better 

    Going back to Haase’s first year as a regular in 2021 he is at -9 DRS | -13.1 FRM in 1,680 innings compared to -6 DRS | -1.2 FRM in 2,266 innings for Sanchez.

    Neither is great shakes, but Haase has graded out worse than Sanchez behind the plate.

    Gary has also been better at the plate with a 98 wRC+ since 2021 compared to an 88 wRC+ for Haase.

    • Like 1

    Why on earth would you even suggest Darrien Miller could be the answer??  First of all he is in AA baseball.  Second he is hitting .228 with one home run all year in AA Biloxi.  That actually sucks for being two steps below the major league.  He hasn't even proven himself to be good for Biloxi let alone then Nashville and then the next step up Milwaukee. 

    3 minutes ago, Brian said:

    Why on earth would you even suggest Darrien Miller could be the answer??  First of all he is in AA baseball.  Second he is hitting .228 with one home run all year in AA Biloxi.  That actually sucks for being two steps below the major league.  He hasn't even proven himself to be good for Biloxi let alone then Nashville and then the next step up Milwaukee. 

    He’s the fifth best qualifying offensive catcher in double-A by wRC+. Does the author of this article overrate him? Definitely. Does he suck? No.

    Joseph Zarr
  • Brewer Fanatic Contributor
  • Posted

    I've been very complimentary of C Darrien Miller this season. He's made improvements. He's handled the lion share of the catching duties. And, as I've said on numerous occasions, I watch roughly 2/3 the affiliate games each week. So, I have a pretty good handle on who is doing what and how they look.

    You could have made an argument for Wes Clarke garnering consideration last season - he had the momentum and was trending - and, coming into this season you could have had some expectations he would put himself in serious contention for a call-up. But, the reality is, he just hasn't hit that well in Triple-A. The strikeout issues have re-surfaced. So, the logical thing to do there is give him more time. He's demonstrated he can improve at a level or excel, in the least, when given a season or so to adjust. However, up until this point, what we can factually say we have here is a streaky power hitter - certainly not a consistent hitter, however. There is absolutely zero need to rush a 40-Man spot considering the ongoing pitching carousel and wealth of options at 1B and DH. Simply consider, for example, Owen Miller returning to the Sounds line-up after being DFA'd and being thrown right to 1B and going 8-for-14 with 1 2B, 5 RBI, and only 1 K. I continue to be absolutely befuddled by this pipe dream that suddenly Wes Clarke is an MLB 40-Man catcher consideration for the Brewers. 

    Miller is nowhere near the level of play needed to be an MLB catcher - and, this isn't a criticism it's simply being honest. Iyou've watched him play the position. He is a nice Minor League player at this juncture - he has improved facets of his game - but is simply too flawed a defensive catchers at present. This doesn't even get into the thought exercise of extrapolating what he might experience facing MLB pitchers. He already has shown a continued propensity for pop up outs because his swing plane so often leaves a level plane. He is improving but he simply needs more time and experience (and off-seasons of continued committed work).

    The Brewers catching scene right now is absolutely fine. You have Haase and Sanchez who have both proven more than adequate fill-in capacity at the MLB level. As mentioned above you have a well-perfoming Mejía AND, you now have a healthy Brian Navarreto. This is where, again, if you haven't seen these players play regularly and you're basing your opinions on something like wRC+ numbers solely you're missing the boat. Nava is 10x the MLB-caliber catcher than anyone in this discussion beyond the aforementioned Haase and Sanchez, obviously. IF the Brewers suddenly found themselves down both a Haase and a Sanchez they would simply accept Nava and Mejía with flawed MLB bats but (in Nava's case) a bat that has shown big hit capacity but both known for solid to plus defensive presence. At that juncture, they aren't going to be thinking: "Well, we could call up Damien and he could lean into some pitches and pray for some walks and hope the opposing team doesn't take advantage of his sub-average arm." We can simply enjoy he's improving at Double-A and go from there. Just consider the path of Nick Kahle in comparison to both Miller and Clarke behind the backstop. He is also nowhere near an MLB-level catcher but simply consider how he has been used in comparison. 

    • Like 3
    48 minutes ago, Joseph Zarr said:

    I've been very complimentary of C Darrien Miller this season. He's made improvements. He's handled the lion share of the catching duties. And, as I've said on numerous occasions, I watch roughly 2/3 the affiliate games each week. So, I have a pretty good handle on who is doing what and how they look.

    You could have made an argument for Wes Clarke garnering consideration last season - he had the momentum and was trending - and, coming into this season you could have had some expectations he would put himself in serious contention for a call-up. But, the reality is, he just hasn't hit that well in Triple-A. The strikeout issues have re-surfaced. So, the logical thing to do there is give him more time. He's demonstrated he can improve at a level or excel, in the least, when given a season or so to adjust. However, up until this point, what we can factually say we have here is a streaky power hitter - certainly not a consistent hitter, however. There is absolutely zero need to rush a 40-Man spot considering the ongoing pitching carousel and wealth of options at 1B and DH. Simply consider, for example, Owen Miller returning to the Sounds line-up after being DFA'd and being thrown right to 1B and going 8-for-14 with 1 2B, 5 RBI, and only 1 K. I continue to be absolutely befuddled by this pipe dream that suddenly Wes Clarke is an MLB 40-Man catcher consideration for the Brewers. 

    Miller is nowhere near the level of play needed to be an MLB catcher - and, this isn't a criticism it's simply being honest. Iyou've watched him play the position. He is a nice Minor League player at this juncture - he has improved facets of his game - but is simply too flawed a defensive catchers at present. This doesn't even get into the thought exercise of extrapolating what he might experience facing MLB pitchers. He already has shown a continued propensity for pop up outs because his swing plane so often leaves a level plane. He is improving but he simply needs more time and experience (and off-seasons of continued committed work).

    The Brewers catching scene right now is absolutely fine. You have Haase and Sanchez who have both proven more than adequate fill-in capacity at the MLB level. As mentioned above you have a well-perfoming Mejía AND, you now have a healthy Brian Navarreto. This is where, again, if you haven't seen these players play regularly and you're basing your opinions on something like wRC+ numbers solely you're missing the boat. Nava is 10x the MLB-caliber catcher than anyone in this discussion beyond the aforementioned Haase and Sanchez, obviously. IF the Brewers suddenly found themselves down both a Haase and a Sanchez they would simply accept Nava and Mejía with flawed MLB bats but (in Nava's case) a bat that has shown big hit capacity but both known for solid to plus defensive presence. At that juncture, they aren't going to be thinking: "Well, we could call up Damien and he could lean into some pitches and pray for some walks and hope the opposing team doesn't take advantage of his sub-average arm." We can simply enjoy he's improving at Double-A and go from there. Just consider the path of Nick Kahle in comparison to both Miller and Clarke behind the backstop. He is also nowhere near an MLB-level catcher but simply consider how he has been used in comparison. 

    I once considered jokingly referring to Miller's statistical profile this season as Luke Adams - power + catching gear. There are guys who rarely swing and miss because they can hit almost any pitch they swing at and guys who rarely swing and miss because they only swing at pitches they can hit. Just going off of the numbers, it seems likely that Miller joins Adams in the second category. Does the eye test bear that out?

    Joseph Zarr
  • Brewer Fanatic Contributor
  • Posted

    53 minutes ago, CheeseheadInQC said:

    I once considered jokingly referring to Miller's statistical profile this season as Luke Adams - power + catching gear. There are guys who rarely swing and miss because they can hit almost any pitch they swing at and guys who rarely swing and miss because they only swing at pitches they can hit. Just going off of the numbers, it seems likely that Miller joins Adams in the second category. Does the eye test bear that out?

    Interesting. I would generally say, Miller swings at a majority of good pitches. He also takes good pitches. He's a player, actually, where the BA matches what I see. My 'contention' (I say this very loosely here as I am merely rooting for development across the board) with his hitting approach is I don't like his swing path. He has a swing path that says it want's loft; power; and gappers. BUT, he isn't really that type of hitter - and the results absolutely bare this out on a nightly basis. As a result, he hits a lot of weak pop outs. When he isn't doing that, he is also hitting a lot of weak grounders which tells me the path isn't consistent. I desperately want to see him level his swing path. Period. He already has selectivity and the ability to stand in the box. Let's get a better swing profile. I stand firmly in this opinion. I think it would do wonders for his overall prospects.

    5 hours ago, CheeseheadInQC said:

    He’s the fifth best qualifying offensive catcher in double-A by wRC+. Does the author of this article overrate him? Definitely. Does he suck? No.

    I'm sure the rating is based on AA standards which is way below the major league level. How could you rate him any different if he has never played at the major league level?? You can't.



    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...