Why overpay for him if you don't have to? The whole point, to me, is that in this situation, they *do* have to 'overpay' for Weeks. Otherwise, to quote FatterThanJoey, Rickie tells the Brewers to pound sand, & goes & signs for at least 5/$62M in FA. I say 'overpay' because, as I've made clear, I don't believe it would be an overpay. Offense can be replaced much easier than pitching. This is true as a blanket statement, but not specifically in the case of Weeks. No sense in budgeting yourself out of other players by paying Weeks substantially more than he is worth. Obviously the whole discussion hinges around whether someone is like me, and fully believes '10 is a good example of the production Weeks will provide going forward... or if someone thinks he's just clearly going to miss a lot of injury time over the length of the comparable extension. I just want the Brewers to take advantage of the fact that second basemen, as a group, right now seem to be underpaid relative to other positions. This is a premier talent in the prime of his career, at a premium position. He's worked his way past just not being a liability in the field, but actually has developed himself into an asset with the leather. This is the type of player good organizations build around imo, not stonewall & lose in free agency.