I have no problem with you finding fault in WAR's treatment of defense, but nothing I've seen has McGehee as even an average fielder. His UZR/150 at 3B last season was -22.0, and this season so far is -13.3. Combine in the old 'eye test' where you can see in plain sight that he just doesn't cover much ground at all, and I think it's very safe to say he's a liability at 3B overall... but he's the classic guy that makes most plays he can get to, and fans tend to think those guys are good or solid defenders. Just like you saying McGehee doesn't have to be special (based on ZIPS, which would have had McGehee as garbage in '09) to be better than Gamel, the reverse is also true. Neither guy is a very special player at this point, but the reason I rally so hard in favor of Gamel is that he has room still to grow, whereas we're seeing 100% of Casey McGehee's upside. I think for him to get there he has some growing up to do. And I think for him to be better than McGehee this season, all it would've taken was some more forward-thinking roster management from Melvin & Macha.