Huh? So it's okay for the players, the employees, to get filthy rich but it's somehow wrong for the owners to make a buck in all of this? No. It's about proportion. If there were a payroll cap all it would do is make the owners take in a disproportionate amount of the revenue. What I will never understand is why so many fans seem to think the players are the villains. The owners are the ones ripping you off at the gate & concession stands, not the players. Put it this way... if you work at Business X, which has seen its profits skyrocket in recent years, wouldn't you, as an employee, expect to see your wages increase? The scale of pay involved is irrelevant imo when discussing how employees should be compensated. The economy sucks right now, so people are getting laid off. When the economy goes well, people get raises. Just because baseball players make at worst hundreds of thousands of dollars doesn't mean they should be arbitrarily restricted in terms of pay scale. If you don't like how much money they make, how about the amount that owners rake in? Why do they tend to be so immune from public scorn? It just makes little sense to me, other than that the players are more visible & that many fans have this image that the owner is just a fan, 'Just like me' Teams set ticket/concession prices at amounts which they feel will sell well and at the same time bring in the maximum amount of revenue. It's basically the same as any business Exactly. Just because the numbers are so extreme doesn't mean that it shouldn't be considered in that manner (in mho)