Every contract currently on the Brewers has been forecast to go along with any future salaries. Ben Sheets contract this year ends and that is $12 million worth that is coming off the books Is your argument that future contract years (ie Soup, Hall) are figured in & therefore static, yet Ben's contract coming off the books isn't static and is free money? A budget's a budget. You can talk about it however you want, but realistically the Brewers aren't going to see their budget increase by more than a few million next year (just my guess). Adding in that any deal with Sheets extends beyond one season, as do arbitration/pay increases, and you have to plan deeper than, 'Hey -- we've got the money next year!' The Brewers are fine financially and have the money to be able to resign Sheets. No one here is arguing they don't. In fact, people have repeated to you that it's not a question of "can", but instead "should". Your argument appears to be that, for 2009, they can afford Sheets's salary, so he should be signed for 4-ish seasons.