Yes no upside, if he's healthy they're not trading him to us. If he say breaks his leg and his out 4 months, they let him go and make us pay him. No upside. I disagree. What is the point of claiming anybody on waivers then? You claim a guy like this mainly to block your competitors up the food chain from getting him. Like you said, if he's healthy, chances are they are not trading him anyway. I'll take my chance that he doesn't 'break his leg' between the time he goes on waivers and September 1st, if he does, I'll collect the draft picks that will come when he's a free agent.I agree. I've seen a couple of explanations, none of which makes any sense to me. I know it's not a big deal because St. Louis would pull him back from us anyway, but as I said in my original post, if we pass and Atlanta claims him and works out a deal, that is a really bad thing for us. And entirely preventable..... Edit: The money thing is crazy, BTW. So, if we could "buy" Lance Berkman for the next 5 weeks + playoffs for $1.3M, some of you wouldn't do that?