It seems that the Bucks had the choice to keep basically all but one. If it had to be one guy, Brogdon may well be the one who's best replaced by a DDV/Brown/Hill/Veteran Minimum person than anyone else. Good ability to drive and hit 3s, but we're also not lacking in that regard. We'll miss his FT shooting, though. I mean, if you absolutely had to choose one star to let go, wouldn't most people choose Brogdon? Not to mention Brogdon at least got us back some minor draft picks. Clearly Hill was paid a bunch in large part because of his clutch playoff play. Whatever value they added to that, this only makes re-signing Middleton and his terrific playoff play all the more important to the point where his contract really isn't an overpay at all, regardless of the salary cap stuff. I'm a little bit surprised it wasn't Lopez who they chose to let go. I was curious if they'd choose to move more to a quicker 5 instead of the lumbering Lopez, but I guess they're sticking with the "protect the paint/rebounding" style of defense again next year, not that it didn't work well even through the playoffs. Assuming Boston finds a decent 5 to play for them, they could well be the class of the East next year. I think Tatum/Brown are going to thrive without Kyrie there. Plus Boston won't have Kyrie there to pawn off defensive assignments onto out-of-position teammates like he always did.