while there have been some doubts voiced about inman in the last month, there weren't prior to that...he was the #3 prospect in Basball america entering the season...new top prospect Manny parra was 18...so i think there is some revisionism going on when people say that will wasn't a bonafide top prospect...he definitely was... and i agree with you to some degree about thatcher and garrison...i've never actually been much of a fan of garrison..he doesnt throw that hard and he doesnt strike a bunch of people out...i just thought this was a very weird trade for the brewers.. and as for melvin's comments, of course he has said that...but prior to now, he had not acted on them...he also hadnt dumped a ton of money into a league average pitcher in suppan or brought in junk like counsell i guess it boils down to this: I look at the young guys that the brewers drafted and traded for as prospects and i see the backbone of this team...fielder, hardy, braun, yo, villy, parra, hall, sheets, and hart...those are the guys that have made this a playoff caliber team... of the guys that have been brought in as vwets, only coc has made a huge difference on this team... so, i really think that the change in action---bringing in vets from outside the organization---what i view as a change in philosophy---has not helped the team in fact, i think it has weakened the team...and i think it will continue to weaken the team as more trades are made.. the reason i picked this trade as a talking point is because this is the point where we finally traded top prospects away... I understand fully why a lot of you guys disagree with me...and i understand that Melvin has said he was going to do this...but i also don't see the team as improved...and i'm not so sure this team will make the playoffs...so it really burns when they gave up young players... ok, as for the comp picks, great...but you are just delaying the arrival of internal help even longer...and of cours,e inman may amount to nothing... but what if this isnt the year? then what>? and how has this deal made the team better next year? i really like doug melvin...but he's made some moves that i dont like over the last year...and i think this most recent one burns the most because i think it weakened the team next year and the year after... anyway, glad to have a discussion on this matter... yea, melvin may have said he was going to start doing this when the team got competetive, but i don't think it has improved the team