But what if the other GMs main goal is to improve his team, and he needs a SS? Is it more important to put the screws to a team, or is it more important to fill your holes? The Orioles look to be pretty good in 2011, and would be better if they had Hardy. Okay, point taken, and ultimately you may be right. But if I'm a truly successful GM, I'll go get what I need for cheaper than someone else who overpays. If a team's got a problem, you are duty bound to take advantage of them. And if the Brewers are stupid enough to trade Hardy over the off season, even though Escobar is the better player, then they deserve to be fleeced.