The run-first doesn't seem to hinder Michigan and their recruitment. In 2017 they averaged 27 pass/41 rush, in 2018 27/42, in 2019 32/38, 2020 36/29 (and subsequently 2-4, their worst year), and 2021 so far 16/46 (their best start in years). Ohio State leans run - in 2017 31/42, in 2018 40/41, 2019 29/47, 2020 28/43 (in the national championship game), 2021 32/33 (their worst start in years). In the year that Russell Wilson was QB UW averaged 23 pass to 44 rush, and Wilson still threw for 3000 yards and 33 TDs. The running game threat opened up the passing game. I don't recall seeing one jet sweep yesterday; I don't recall them even faking it (but they did run some motion across). They have the perfect guy to run it - Guerendo. They don't stack two WRs out wide and do any quick WR screens like they did with Cephus and even going back to Abby/Toon. Looked like ND had a triangle 2nd level defense with the safety up behind the ILBs because there was no threat to the outside. I don't know if Chryst is over his head with HC/OC-playcalling/QB coach on his plate. That might be why they tried Rudy as OC/play-calling; Rudy is still listed as the run game coordinator, so maybe the lack of jet sweep is on him? But they can be a run-first team and succeed if they go back to what made them successful which was motion and shifts to confuse the defense. Maybe the solution is to bring in a full-time OC, but they are only allowed 10 coaches in FBS so someone will need to be replaced. Their WR and RB coaches are new so maybe there is some adjustment going in there. What we don't know is if the play-calling is holding back the players, or if the players are holding back the play-calling (and they have to simplify the playbook because the players are having difficulty with it).