Understood - when it comes to the level of income in Ohtani's stratosphere where expenditures are typically combed over to identify deductions/writeoffs, and the level of complexity having to file state returns in any state he played in each year that would be tied to this account, you'd think more than Ohtani and Mizuhara would have access to it for tax purposes. Willful ignorance could obviously be at play by others involved in Ohtani's circle...but frankly that seems to be way too common surrounding this century's version of Babe Ruth to be 100% truth.
And if this story currently out there is truly all there is to it, why would Mizuhara have any incentive to not bet on anything baseball-related? tens of thousands of wagers on seemingly everything but baseball (MLB, international, anywhere). Very interesting how quickly that was common knowledge, that he didn't place any bets on baseball. If he was that much of a degenerate where he was robbing his best friend and primary translating client blind to pay off his own exploding gambling debt while making endless sports bets, I don't see him as the type of character to then avoid placing any bets on baseball based on the ethics of breaking the cardinal rule for MLB players because he was secretly stealing the funds from Ohtani's account.
I'll add to this general discussion that I actually don't care much at all about Mizuhara/Ohtani making non-baseball sports bets, even while living in a state where that is still currently illegal - it's the way this cover-up attempt has unfolded that instantly went from Ohtani trying to help his friend out with a series of wire transfers to pay off gambling debt during the same time the fed investigation into this bookie implicated Ohtani's account, to "he was robbed" right after Mizuhara's ESPN interview and after attorneys got a more complete look at the financial paper trail that sticks in my craw. I know others disagree and that's fine.