Well we shouldn't waive Anderson, but a 1/5 deal should not lock a guy into a rotation spot if he's not one of the best 5. If the competition between Anderson and say Lauer is close...even if Lauer is slightly better I would go with Anderson to maintain the flexibility. If Lauer is lightyears ahead of Anderson, well Mr. Anderson can pitch out of the bullpen as 6th starter/swingman. Not the best use of 5 million, but to give a guy a rotation spot when he's not the best option to avoid "wasting" 5 million is bad management. That 5 million is a sunk cost at this point and shouldn't factor into decision making. Yes, it's a sunk cost, because it's guaranteed money, but the guy hasn't thrown a single pitch of actual innings that matter yet. The season hasn't started and there's people that (seemingly) want him cut, at the cost of 5 million dollars. I absolutely understand sunk cost, but they didn't sign the guy to not give him a chance to perform. If they go into the season and Anderson isn't one of the top 5 options, then great, find a role for him. But to just be saying "cut him" after throwing 3 (relatively benign) spring training innings, in which we can't really glean a lot of data is pretty out there. I have zero problem if Anderson doesn't make the rotation, but I also know that Stearns isn't going to sign a guy to 5 million, and then cut him for no reason when the Brewers operate on a tighter budget than most other teams.