No, definitely not. The bottom line is, his UZR/150 says that he has been terrible this year. As was mentioned earlier, given the sample size, that does not say much about his performance in the future at third, but although I don't have the UZR data to back it up, I doubt many premiere fielding 3B's have ever posted numbers like that even in a small sample. Basically what I'm saying here is that both Bill Hall and Ryan Braun can go through an 0 for 30, but that type of performance in a small sample is much more likely to happen for a Bill Hall than a Ryan Braun. Understanding that samples of this size for UZR are similar to 20-30 AB's for a player, it would be ridiculous to conclude that Casey McGehee is a bad defensive 3B, but it is somewhat more likely that he is a bad defensive 3B than a good defensive 3B. Hopefully that rant is somewhat coherent. The problem with defensive data is that the 0-30 actually happened. By that I mean if we have a .280 hitter on the season we can argue whether that's a good projection going forward but we do know he got a hit in 28% of his ABs. Defensive stats are more like saying guy hit .280 based upon the velocity and direction the ball traveled when it left his bat so we can only estimate he hit .280. I wish Dave Cameron understood this fact.