you know, I really don't want to fight here (i'm old . . creaky), but I disagree. Lou Piniella is a much better manager than Yost. Last night when Lou DIDN'T bring in the lefthander to face Fielder and instead walked him and had Gaudin get Hart, then DIDN'T bunt with Fontenot are examples. Lou doesn't play strictly by the book. Yost does (hence Torres in the 9th). Unfortunatly for that, that means when Lou fails, everyone screams and when Yost does we just say's "that's what the book says!" But Lou's biggest deal comes from taking heat off the players AFTER the game. The reporters flock to him for the good soundbite and let the players alone for the most part. Even in a toxic media town like Chicago (where Mariotti is spoiling for a fight with his own paper's beat reporters). Lou takes the heat and gives 'em what they want so they don't even have time to go down to the clubhouse, they're too busy trying to post a Lou rant to beat each other to the punch. There is something to be said for that. Last years Barrett v. Zambrano deal would have eaten most teams in a cancerous mess, but Lou handled it internally and got rid of the problem, even when most analysts argued Barrett's bat was invaluable. Yost's handling of most players issues (last year's Estrada mess, this year's Hall issues) are to pretend that they don't exist, so then they stew openly. just my thoughts.