I guess I'm a mix of old and new school thinking on closer. New, I don't think they should spend 8, 9, 10 million a year and hire a guy who will be the best pitcher on the staff, at least without having a Dodgers payroll. You absolutely shouldn't do it if he's teetering toward the Gagne line. Maybe Papelbon has a better chance of being pretty good than bad, but it will be a disaster if he's bad and he has to somehow be acquired from Amaro. Old, while its just 3 outs like every inning, its loaded with drama and pressure. As much as people say that a guy who is really good in the 7th will be just as good in the 9th, I don't believe it. I sure can't say who is in the org that might handle the role well and maybe even flourish. Skills wise, Henderson, Thornburg or Jeffress seem like possibilities. Maybe its crazy, but what if they could get Hellweg down to 2 pitches and he just pounded the zone? There are others like Knebel. There are a lot of people on the forum who know much more than I do about the pitchers in the system who could probably poke holes in some of those suggestions but also suggest others as possible. I am totally okay with a ST competition, but also with Krod coming back. Various posters have valid and legitimate reasons for not wanting him as a choice. He doesn't throw hard and there is personal baggage. But in a sense he's ideal for the role. He's pretty good at it skills wise and he's not going to be knocked down by the pressure or drama. He won't be the best pitcher in the relief corps and I think that's good.