No, I think he has zero trade value and I think it's 50/50 that he even gets claimed. This is a guy who really just needs to sit for 2 years behind Rodgers in ONE offense. I'm not confident he sticks, but I am confident that if he'd been handled properly, he'd be a very good backup QB and possibly a good starter(good closer to Winston/Mariotta than Matty Ryan....etc... Incidentally, has ANYONE heard anything about Nick Perry? I saw in the comments section in the Green Bay Gazette maybe? Not positive, but it was talking about the potential of bringing Nick Perry back this year for the vet minimum. And of course, half the fans lose their minds, but if you could get him for the veteran minimum, and he could come in and rotate with the guys we've got their now? That would make us so much more dangerous. Have him play 20-25 snaps instead of 75. He's one of the best in the NFL at setting the edge and he can get to the QB. it seems entirely unrealistic. I've never heard of a situation like this...coming back in the same year. But maybe Perry's just real about it and knows they had to cut him? Any chance?? I'm curious if anyone would be opposed. He wouldn't play ahead of Gary....I'm not seeing a downside. They're top-heavy at OLB'er, they only have 4 guys now with Gilbert traded. Perry is undisputedly a good player when healthy. I’ll politely disagree on Kizer’s value. I’m not delusional, but as I’ve stated before - I believe his current floor is a waiver claim. He’s young, healthy, athletic, and smart. Certainly worth a flier as a QB3 / reclamation project. I guess we’ll find out his value soon enough. And I have no concerns about signing Perry on a minimum contract. I’d hate for him to take a roster spot from a promising young player, but injuries happen and I could see him being a good addition at that price.