Ain't hindsight from me. And sure if it had worked I wouldn't have a reason to be talking about this, but I was pretty adamant about not wanting Hader anywhere near the 9th inning. The division blowage in Colorado was the last warning sign. I mean I think it was actually you that said you didn't hate my idea of bringing Hader out first. Maybe he'd suck then too, but, there is less pressure in the 5th, there is more time to get the runs back, and you have more options if he clearly doesn't have it going. Give the 8th/9th to Pom who had shown more control and better secondary stuff. You're absolutely right about Guerra or anybody else going in there and blowing it, but literally the exact reason I didn't want Hader closing that game out came true. But if someone else had blown the game late like that I would be feeling more like "Well what can you do, they all stink," rather than "Hader blew it and I saw it coming." So your take is CC should have brought Hader out in the 5th so he could likely blow the game earlier because he was toast in your eyes, then proceed to lay out other closer options as also being awful with the exception of Pom (who did give them 6 outs with the lead). I guess you wanted to hold onto Pom to use him for innings 7 and 8 assuming he'd be pitching from behind since the rest of the pen is a disaster, Hader included? Not sure anyone is able to follow at this point... Hard to fault CC for going with what got the Brewers to the postseason from a bullpen standpoint - sucks that it didn't work out but taking any other approach to what he tried to do would've been even more reason to question it. Hader has been this team's closer, good and bad, for all of 2019 - to switch it up in a winner take all wild card game because he gave up a 2 out solo shot at Coors Field to tie a game in game 161 after being dominant in September (27K, 3 BB, 2HR, 0.7WHIP) is just beyond kneejerk. The only thought I had to change how the pen was managed last night was that they may have tried using other relief options to get through the 6th before going to Pomeranz - then you could pinch hit his spot in the 7th, use him for innings 7-8 with Hader coming in at the first sign of trouble or given the 9th. No, but continue to dismiss me and talk down to me because I guess that's how people cope with Hader blowing the season around here. My take was to bring Hader in, as I said before the game, as the first guy out, and find him pine as soon as a runner was on because the game was too important for his bad version to show up. You act like it's such an insane idea when they literally did that in the NLCS. It was a good plan, unfortunately they scored one run and JJ was terrible. Again, please stop acting like the Colorado game was the first time Hader looked ugly as a closer this year. There are 14 other home runs the guy gave up in less than 80 innings. A guy with that propensity for home runs is really not who I want pitching against the meat of a very good lineup in a 1-2 run game. At the very least take him out of the game when it's obvious it's not his night, which was very obvious last night. Instead we let it ride like it was May 15th. Quit it with the "hard to follow crap" and the insinuations that I have to be crazy or stupid. I've been totally consistent in how I would've used Hader. The first guy out, HOPING he takes the 5th and 6th - then any combination of matchups until you can get the ball to Pomeranz. If he looks bad, you have to go longer relief, but there were ways to win that game last night even with bad Hader showing up.