Honestly, I can't keep having this argument, it won't go anywhere. But the Packers as late as week 14 for positioning themselves for the 1 seed and were essentially a unanimous top 5 team from any analyst. Then Parsons went down and the whole thing fell apart.
So that's not LaFleur's fault, right?
You would think not, except you can make a strong case that at 9-3-1 the Packers should have been more like 11-2 and he was the primary reason they weren't. And this isn't new. He then goes on to crap his pants in Chicago, does it again in the playoffs.
But my desire to have him canned isn't really based on last night or even this season. It's that he has been failing in the same ways for 7 years. Misuse of timeouts, letting his friends be assistants without repercussions for awful production, turtling with a lead etc. He can go be a good OC somewhere. He's a bad coach. This is not the next Super Bowl coach. It hasn't been like a year or two. It's been 7 damn years. He's essentially Mike Sherman only LaFleur has enjoyed better QB play.
When blowing multi-score leads has become the team identity I have a hard time believing there's a significant talent problem.