I don't know about that. You have one possible impact player (Arcia), a few ok players (Segura, Nelson), a couple still possible, and some BP guys. The cupboard wasn't bare, but it had a lot of ramen noodles... Hello???? Khris Davis???? He might not meet the definition of impact player, but he's hit one HR every 16.3 AB which is a better career rate than either Fielder or Braun and he was 13 on that list and he's developed into one of the premier power bats in all of baseball. Scooter Gennett's been essentially an everyday major league player since arriving in the big leagues and is cumulative 5.3 WAR player and he was 12th on the list. Thornburg's turned into not just any BP guy but a back end stud. Had they kept him starting, I'm pretty certain he'd be a decent starter too. If you look back at the Brewers prospect list 4 years from now, I guaranty you that many that are highly rated now will never pan out. For a team that at the time didn't have much respect as an organization, it was not a bad list at all. Yes, I could've listed out many more people in the "OK" bin. Khrush and Scooter were certainly meant to be included there. And to that point, I was one of Khrush's biggest supporters back in the day. But he still isn't anything more than MLB average. Not impact players. I disagree with Thornburg. He might have made a 5th SP, but makes a much better RP. Still, a bunch of SPs on the list turned into RPs, which is the wrong direction to build a team. Peralta might end up there too... Every organization, no matter how pathetic, generates MLB players. But if you create a bunch of 1.0 WAR/season players, you aren't going to get far. You need a healthy dose of 2.0-3.0 with a sprinkling of 5.0+ WAR/season players to get to the WS. Khrush and Scooter are both ~1.0-1.5 (peak at 2.0) WAR players. Nice, but not impact players. And as someone else stated, replacing better players, thus decreasing the team WAR overall.